Autonomous Mobile Map Reconciliation for Obstacle Disagreement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous mobile devices (AMDs) face navigation challenges due to disagreements between global and local maps, leading to incorrect obstacle detection and potential collisions or inability to reach destinations, which can be exacerbated by sensor errors and environmental anomalies.

Innovation Solution

The AMD generates a differential map to identify discrepancies between local and global maps, classifies clusters based on geometric and fill ratio thresholds, and adjusts navigation paths to resolve anomalies by acquiring additional sensor data from optimal viewpoints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the AMD relies on global and local maps for navigation, then it can autonomously move through physical space, but disagreements between maps cause incorrect obstacle detection leading to collisions or inability to reach destinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation reliabilityVSAvoidobstacle detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating a differential map before navigation decisions are made. The differential map is created by comparing global and local maps in advance to identify discrepancies, allowing the AMD to resolve map disagreements before they cause navigation errors or collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The differential map serves as an intermediary element that mediates between the global and local maps. It highlights areas where the maps disagree, enabling the navigation system to focus on resolving specific discrepancies rather than dealing with entire map datasets, thus improving both reliability and detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the AMD acquires additional sensor data from multiple viewpoints to resolve map discrepancies, then obstacle detection accuracy improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing additional sensor data acquisition only on specific areas where map disagreements occur, as identified by the differential map. Instead of uniformly collecting data from all areas, the AMD targets only the disputed regions, improving detection accuracy where needed while minimizing unnecessary power consumption in areas where maps already agree.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the AMD traverses areas with map disagreements to reach destinations, then navigation efficiency improves, but collision risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by generating the differential map before navigation, identifying all areas with map disagreements in advance. This allows the navigation planner to proactively route around disputed areas or prioritize them for verification, balancing navigation efficiency with collision risk mitigation rather than reacting to uncertainties during movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of energy

If the AMD conserves power by limiting sensor data acquisition, then energy efficiency improves, but ability to resolve map anomalies deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidmap data reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The differential map enables local quality by directing limited sensor resources only to areas where map disagreements occur. The system acquires additional sensor data selectively in disputed regions identified by the differential map, maintaining map data reliability where it matters most while conserving energy by avoiding redundant data collection in areas where maps already agree.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12422276B1System to determine map data for autonomous mobile device map
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12422276B1 patent drawing
  • US12422276B1 patent drawing
  • US12422276B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Maps of a physical space provide information to an autonomous mobile device (AMD) about the location of objects. For example, a local map may represent objects currently detected while a global map represents objects that persist over time. Disagreements between the maps may result from quantization errors, sensor errors, changes in the physical space over time that are shown in one map but not another, and so forth. For example, the local map may indicate an obstacle in a space that the global map indicates is empty, or vice versa. A cluster representing an object in a map may be assessed to distinguish if the object is actual or false. Other techniques may be used to determine disagreements. Information about persistent disagreements may be stored for mitigation. The AMD may mitigate disagreements by exploring the physical space associated with the disagreement to add to map data.