Mobile Network Scheduling for Privileged User Access Rights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile network technologies do not effectively prioritize packet switched data services for privileged users during emergency situations, leading to potential congestion and failure in resource allocation for critical services like video calls and multimedia information.

Innovation Solution

The method combines Allocation/Retention Priority (ARP) information with pre-emption strategies, using both service and user-specific Quality of Service (QoS) attributes to prioritize radio resource allocation, employing threshold-based procedures for switching between soft and hard pre-emption, and integrating CS and PS service parameters for admission control, scheduling, and interference reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If eMLPP pre-emption is applied for CS services, then privileged users gain preferential access rights, but packet switched data services lack prioritization mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess rights for privileged usersVSAvoidservice coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the eMLPP pre-emption mechanism originally designed for circuit-switched services to packet-switched data services. The core pre-emption logic is made universal across different service domains, allowing privileged users to gain prioritization in both CS and PS domains through a unified approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces QoS parameters including ARP (Allocation/Retention Priority) to differentiate and prioritize packet-switched services. By changing the parameter set from traditional CS-domain parameters to PS-domain QoS parameters, the system enables prioritization mechanisms appropriate for data services while maintaining the privileged access model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If network resources are allocated to ordinary users during congestion, then network utilization is maximized, but privileged users cannot establish calls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork utilizationVSAvoidservice establishment for privileged users
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements pre-emption mechanisms that allow privileged users to preemptively take over network resources when needed. The system prepares for potential privileged user needs by maintaining the capability to reallocate resources dynamically, preventing resource starvation for critical services even when resources are currently allocated to ordinary users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a dynamic resource allocation system where resource assignment is not fixed but can change based on user priority and network conditions. The scheduler continuously adjusts resource distribution by evaluating QoS parameters and pre-emption rules, allowing the system to adapt between maximizing utilization and ensuring privileged access based on real-time needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If standard QoS parameters are used for resource distribution, then resource allocation is simplified, but privileged treatment for specific user groups cannot be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation mechanismVSAvoidprivileged access rights
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges standard QoS parameters with eMLPP priority levels into a unified scheduling framework. By combining these two parameter sets, the system maintains the simplicity of standard QoS mechanisms while incorporating the privileged access rights of eMLPP, allowing both ordinary QoS differentiation and special privileged treatment to coexist in the resource allocation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2645798B1Scheduling method in a mobile telecommunication system
Publication Date: 2022.08.31 TELEFONICA GERMANY GMBH & CO
  • EP2645798B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2645798B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2645798B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a mobile communication system. In particular, to the field of handling preferred access rights within the packet switched part of a mobile network. The present invention teaches using both, user specific priority classes standardised for packet switched services as well as priority classes standardised for circuit switched services in the packet switched domain. Further, the present invention relates to a preferred scheduling for prioritised users in the packet switched domain based on priority classes defined for packet switched and circuit switched services. Furthermore, the invention relates to a procedure of controlling preferred access rights and scheduling priority in a communication system serving prioritised and non-prioritised users.