Multi-level Security Mechanism for Mobile Panel Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile device security systems are vulnerable to unauthorized access and impersonation, particularly when internal individuals, such as family members, use valid user codes to bypass security measures.

Innovation Solution

A two-level security system that integrates geo-location tracking and face recognition, where mobile phone numbers are registered against unique user codes, and the geo-location app tracks devices within a predetermined range, with face recognition authentication to verify authorized users, sending alerts to registered users and a central monitor station if an intruder is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user codes are used for panel access, then ease of operation is improved, but security reliability deteriorates due to easy replication and hacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel accessVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into multiple independent verification stages: user code verification, geo-location verification, and face recognition verification. Each stage acts as a separate security layer, so compromise of one stage does not lead to complete system failure. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation through structured workflow while significantly improving security reliability through multi-factor authentication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering authorized user codes, pre-configuring geo-location parameters for protected premises, and pre-storing face recognition templates before actual access attempts. This preliminary setup enables rapid authentication during operation while ensuring security requirements are met in advance, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and security robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If geo-location tracking is added to verify user presence, then security reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveauthenticationVSAvoidsecurity system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile device serves multiple functions: it acts as a user identifier through its phone number, a geo-location tracker through integrated GPS, and a biometric authentication device through face recognition camera. By making the mobile device multi-functional, the system improves authentication reliability without requiring separate dedicated devices for each function, thus limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel system acts as an intermediary that coordinates between user code verification, geo-location tracking, and face recognition. It integrates these separate verification functions into a unified authentication process, managing the complexity centrally rather than distributing it across multiple independent systems. This intermediary approach improves reliability through comprehensive verification while containing device complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If face recognition is implemented to prevent impersonation, then security reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional authentication steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser verificationVSAvoidaccess process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is made dynamic and adaptive: the system selectively applies face recognition verification based on contextual factors such as whether the user code is recognized, geo-location status, and security settings. When conditions permit, the system can streamline the process; when security concerns arise, it activates additional verification steps. This dynamic approach improves reliability by applying verification only when necessary while maintaining ease of operation during routine authenticated access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the panel communicates authentication status, geo-location verification results, and security alerts to users in real-time. This feedback allows users to understand the authentication process state, reducing perceived complexity. The system also provides feedback to adjust authentication requirements based on detected anomalies, improving reliability without permanently increasing operational burden for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If multiple security checks are performed, then security reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveauthenticationVSAvoidaccess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-registering user codes, pre-configuring geo-location parameters for protected premises, and pre-storing face recognition templates before actual access attempts. This preliminary setup enables rapid authentication during operation while ensuring security requirements are met in advance, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and security robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial verification for routine authenticated access (using pre-verified user codes and geo-location) and reserves full multi-factor verification including face recognition for suspicious or high-security situations. This partial action approach maintains fast access times for legitimate users while preserving the capability for comprehensive verification when needed, thus improving reliability without excessive time loss for normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3291505B1Multi-level security mechanism for accessing a panel
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3291505B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3291505B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3291505B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A panel associated with maintaining security of mobile devices. The devices such as mobile phones may be registered with user codes at the panel. If a user wants to access the panel, the user may enter a user code corresponding to a number of the device. The device may have a geo-location app in that the panel can track the device. If the user is within the pre-determined range of a protected location, another check about the user may be effected with a face recognition app. A face scan of the user may be compared with a face of an authorized user. If the user is found to be unauthorized anywhere along the above-noted process, then the user may be deemed to be an intruder, and an alert can be sent to a central monitor station, which may take action to remove any threat associated with the intruder.