Mobile Phone Acceleration State Detection Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices with acceleration sensors struggle to accurately differentiate between walking and other movement states, such as riding a bicycle or using transportation other than a bicycle, leading to incorrect determinations due to factors like road surface conditions and vehicle type.

Innovation Solution

The electronic device employs a control unit that determines and displays multiple movement states based on acceleration data, maintaining previous states when transitions occur, and correcting determinations based on integrated duration and walking interruptions to accurately identify walking, bicycle, and other transportation modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the control unit determines movement states based solely on acceleration patterns, then the detection process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of differentiating between walking and other movement states deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidmovement state differentiation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of acceleration patterns and pre-processes the data to identify potential state transitions. By preparing and pre-processing acceleration data in advance, the system can quickly respond to state changes while maintaining accuracy through pre-established determination criteria for walking, bicycle, and other transportation states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously monitors acceleration patterns and provides feedback by comparing current patterns with previously determined states. The system uses feedback from acceleration sensor data to confirm or correct movement state determinations, ensuring accurate differentiation between walking, bicycle riding, and other transportation modes while maintaining rapid detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the control unit recognizes multiple movement states (walking, bicycle, other transportation), then the versatility of the device improves, but the complexity of state determination logic increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement state detection capabilityVSAvoidstate determination logic
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit segments the movement state determination into distinct categories: walking state, bicycle state, and other transportation state. Each state has its own determination criteria based on specific acceleration patterns. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple movement states independently with dedicated logic for each, reducing overall complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different determination criteria and analysis methods tailored to each specific movement state. For example, walking detection uses one set of acceleration pattern criteria, while bicycle detection uses another set optimized for cycling movements. This localized approach to each state's determination enables accurate multi-state detection without requiring a single complex universal algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the control unit corrects determinations based on total duration and walking interruptions, then the reliability of state detection improves, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit applies correction only when necessary - specifically when determination duration exceeds a predetermined threshold or when walking interruption patterns are detected. Rather than continuously correcting all determinations, the system performs partial corrections only in cases where the initial determination may be unreliable, reducing processing time while maintaining high reliability for clear-cut cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The determination system performs self-correction by automatically detecting inconsistencies in its own output. When the control unit detects that a determined state duration is unusually long or that acceleration patterns suggest a walking interruption during a non-walking state, it automatically re-evaluates and corrects the determination without external intervention, ensuring reliability while minimizing additional processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables reliable detection and display of various movement states, preventing incorrect classification and ensuring accurate tracking of activity durations and calorie consumption, even under conditions that might otherwise cause misidentification.

Implementation Method 1

Some electronic devices have a function of counting steps based on a value detected by an acceleration sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9568336B2Electronic device
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 KYOCERA CORP
  • US9568336B2 patent drawing
  • US9568336B2 patent drawing
  • US9568336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile telephone device includes a control unit that determines that a state is a state of walking or a movement state different from the state of walking, based on acceleration. In a case in which the control unit determines that a state is the movement state different from the state of walking, if a state immediately before determining the movement state different from the state of walking is the state of walking, the control unit makes the determination valid. As an example, the movement state different from the state of walking is a state of moving on a bicycle or a state of moving by transportation other than the bicycle.