Mobile Proof of Purchase Verification via Geolocation and Product Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for verifying and delivering a proof of purchase are cumbersome, often requiring third-party intervention and manual processing, which hinders instant rebates, coupons, or discounts.

Innovation Solution

A mobile device-based system generates an electronic proof of purchase by obtaining product data and contextual information, using geolocation, image scanning, and RFID capabilities, to validate purchases without third-party intervention, leveraging user trust scores and fraud pattern analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional mail-in rebate processes are used, then fraud risk is reduced through third-party verification, but processing time increases and customer convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud verificationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to self-verify their own purchases through mobile device geolocation and product data element scanning, eliminating the need for third-party mail-in verification while maintaining fraud prevention. The customer's mobile device automatically captures proof of purchase data at the point of sale, allowing instant rebate application without manual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs fraud verification in advance by capturing geolocation data and product data elements at the moment of purchase. This preliminary verification establishes a trusted record that can be instantly used for rebate processing, eliminating subsequent verification delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If third-party intervention is used for rebate processing, then fraud prevention is improved, but system complexity and processing steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile device performs multiple functions: it serves as the product scanner, geolocation tracker, data transmitter, and verification participant. This consolidates what would otherwise require separate third-party systems into a single universal device, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining fraud prevention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as a lightweight intermediary that receives and validates data from mobile devices without requiring complex third-party intervention. It processes verification requests and manages rebate delivery, simplifying the overall system architecture compared to traditional multi-party mail-in processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual proof element mailing is required, then verification accuracy is maintained, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidcustomer convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of mailing physical proof elements with electronic data transmission. Mobile devices automatically capture and transmit product data elements and geolocation information electronically, eliminating the need for physical mailing while maintaining verification accuracy through digital validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of proof of purchase data (product data elements, geolocation records, transaction information) that serve the same verification function as physical mail-in elements. These electronic copies are instantly transmittable and validateable, replacing cumbersome physical documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of operation

If instant electronic verification is implemented, then customer convenience is improved, but fraud detection capability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer convenienceVSAvoidfraud detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The server provides immediate feedback on the validity of submitted proof elements by analyzing geolocation data, product data element authenticity, and transaction information. This real-time feedback mechanism enables instant verification decisions while maintaining fraud detection through automated validation rules and pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system preemptively prevents fraud by validating proof elements at the point of submission rather than allowing potentially fraudulent claims to be processed later. Geolocation verification and product data validation occur before rebate approval, blocking fraudulent attempts before they can result in payments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11037171B2Method for verifying the validity and delivering a proof of purchase from a mobile device and associated computer program
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11037171B2 patent drawing
  • US11037171B2 patent drawing
  • US11037171B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is directed to a method for generating a record (R1-R1) corresponding to the validity of a proof of purchase including obtaining (98) product data elements (31-37) by a camera (24), a keyboard (28) or near-field communication through a mobile device (1), determining (99) contextual information of the mobile device (1) such as its geolocalization, transmitting (100, 101) product data elements (31-37) and contextual information to a server (2), determining (102) on the server (2) from the contextual information and the product data element (31-37) whether the proof of purchase is valid and generating (107) a record (R1-RI) corresponding a valid proof of purchase.