Mobile Radio Network Verification via Three-Way Handshake

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current self-organizing network (SON) techniques in mobile radio communication networks have limitations in verifying operational changes due to a limited view of individual eNodeBs, leading to challenges in identifying and resolving verification collisions and optimizing network performance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a three-way handshake between network entities to manage undo requests, categorize cells, and calculate optimal time slots for resolving collisions, using graph coloring theory and constraint satisfaction methods to identify safe and conflicting undo areas, and employing a SON coordinator to block interfering reconfiguration tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If SON techniques are implemented only at the eNodeB level, then each eNodeB can independently perform self-configuration and self-optimization, but the eNodeB has a limited view of the entire network and cannot verify operational changes effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-configuration capabilityVSAvoidnetwork-wide operational parameter visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a verification entity as an intermediary component that receives operational parameter changes from SON functions, determines verification areas, and coordinates verification processes. This intermediary enables individual eNodeBs to maintain their autonomous SON capabilities while providing network-wide verification through a centralized coordination mechanism, thus resolving the contradiction between local automation and global information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple verification areas share cells showing anomalous behavior, then comprehensive network monitoring is achieved, but verification collisions occur and it cannot be determined which CM changes caused the degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performance monitoringVSAvoidverification collision resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the verification process into distinct phases: determining verification areas, identifying anomalous behavior, and resolving verification collisions through iterative undo requests. When verification collisions occur, the system divides the problem into manageable steps by performing multiple iterative undo requests, each targeting specific configuration changes, until the root cause is isolated and resolved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary actions by determining verification areas and identifying potential verification collisions before executing configuration changes. The verification entity proactively analyzes the network state, identifies cells that may show anomalous behavior, and prepares verification plans in advance, preventing verification collisions from causing system-wide issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If iterative undo requests are performed to resolve verification collisions, then the root cause of network degradation can be identified, but the verification process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecause identification accuracyVSAvoidverification process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the verification entity continuously monitors network performance during iterative undo requests. After each undo operation, the system evaluates whether the anomalous behavior is resolved and uses this feedback to determine the next verification area or configuration change to test. This feedback-driven approach systematically narrows down the root cause while minimizing unnecessary verification steps, balancing precision with time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11729860B2Method of verifying an operation of a mobile radio communication network
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US11729860B2 patent drawing
  • US11729860B2 patent drawing
  • US11729860B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for verifying an operation of a mobile radio communication network is provided, wherein the method comprises sending an Initiation Message from a first network entity to a second network entity, the Initiation Message defining an undo request and comprising an UNDO section defining an undo area, a TRIGGERING_CM section indicating changes to the network, and an ASSISTANCE section; receiving an Assistance-Response Message, the Assistance-Response Message comprising the UNDO section, and an ASSISTED_CM section; and sending an Assistance-Acknowledge Message including an ACK flag and the UNDO section from the first network entity to the second network entity.