Mobile Roadside Assistance Detection for Urgent Vehicle Stoppages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional roadside assistance systems struggle to distinguish between urgent and non-urgent vehicle stoppages, often requiring user input which can be difficult and dangerous, especially in unfamiliar areas, and rely on specialized vehicle-installed hardware.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a user's mobile device to collect data such as location, ambient noise, and physical activities to proactively determine the likelihood of needing roadside assistance, contacting the user if necessary and initiating assistance, without requiring dedicated vehicle hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional roadside assistance systems require user input to determine assistance needs, then system simplicity is maintained, but user safety and ease of operation deteriorate due to the difficulty and danger of providing input while stopped in unfamiliar areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of requesting assistanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects vehicle stoppages and assesses assistance needs without requiring user input. Sensors monitor vehicle status, location, and environmental factors to autonomously determine when roadside assistance is needed, eliminating the need for users to manually request help while stopped in potentially dangerous locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively contacts users before they need to manually request assistance by detecting stoppages in advance. The automatic detection system identifies when a vehicle has stopped and initiates the assistance process beforehand, allowing users to receive help before their situation becomes critical or dangerous

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If conventional systems treat all stoppages uniformly, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates by failing to distinguish between urgent and non-urgent situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituation assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different assessment criteria and response protocols based on the specific characteristics of each stoppage situation. By analyzing local conditions such as location type, vehicle status, time of day, and environmental factors, the system tailors its assistance approach to match the urgency and nature of each specific situation rather than applying a uniform response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts assessment parameters and thresholds based on contextual factors. By monitoring multiple variables simultaneously and changing the weightings and criteria based on the specific situation, the system achieves precise differentiation between urgent and non-urgent cases while managing complexity through adaptive parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If specialized vehicle-installed hardware is used, then reliability of assistance is improved, but device complexity and cost increase, and adaptability to different vehicles decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle compatibilityVSAvoidassistance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a mobile device that can serve multiple functions including detection, communication, and assistance coordination. By leveraging the universal capabilities of smartphones and tablets rather than vehicle-specific hardware, the system achieves broad adaptability across different vehicle types while maintaining reliable assistance delivery through the device's multiple integrated functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile device acts as an intermediary between the vehicle and the roadside assistance system. Rather than requiring direct integration with vehicle hardware, the mobile device mediates the connection, enabling the system to work with any vehicle that has a compatible mobile device, thus achieving universality while maintaining reliability through the intermediary's standardized interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12483871B2Systems and methods for automatic breakdown detection and roadside assistance
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US12483871B2 patent drawing
  • US12483871B2 patent drawing
  • US12483871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention can proactively determine if an individual is likely in need of roadside assistance. Information can be collected from the individual's phone, including the person's location, the type of road, ambient noise, and/or motion of nearby objects. If it is determined that the individual likely needs roadside assistance, the system can proactively contact the individual to see if roadside assistance is desired, and if so, initiates roadside assistance. The system also can provide helpful information, such as safety information, and/or automatically contact other individuals to alert them of the roadside event and the location of the individual.