Mobile Security Robot Integration for Building Anomaly Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The adoption of robots in commercial and industrial settings, particularly in environments requiring frequent human-robot interactions, is hindered by the lack of technologies that effectively integrate robots with building infrastructure and security systems for enhanced security and operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A mobile robot system that performs security, infrastructure, navigation, and inventory management operations by integrating with building infrastructure and security systems, using sensors and communication interfaces to patrol, detect anomalies, and perform corrective actions, while generating semantic maps and interacting with humans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If robots are deployed in commercial and industrial settings for security operations, then security monitoring capability is improved, but device complexity increases due to integration requirements with building infrastructure and security systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring capabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile robot is designed as a multi-functional security system that performs patrol routing, anomaly detection, video recording, and coordination with building infrastructure systems. The robot integrates multiple security functions including motion detection sensors, video cameras, and communication interfaces into a single platform, allowing it to operate independently while also coordinating with central security systems and building infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the robot performs multiple security operations including patrol, monitoring, and corrective actions, then security effectiveness is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to the complexity of coordinating with multiple systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robot autonomously performs security operations including navigating patrol routes, detecting anomalies using onboard sensors, recording video evidence, and executing corrective actions such as locking doors or activating alarms. The system self-manages coordination with building infrastructure and security systems through automated communication protocols, reducing the need for manual intervention while maintaining operational simplicity through centralized control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the robot integrates with building infrastructure and security systems, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to the number of communication interfaces and coordination protocols required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integration capabilityVSAvoidcommunication interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot employs a centralized control system that acts as an intermediary between the mobile robot and multiple building infrastructure systems including security cameras, access control systems, and alarm systems. This intermediary layer manages communication protocols and data exchange, allowing the robot to coordinate with diverse systems through standardized interfaces while abstracting the complexity of individual system protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11445152B2Security automation in a mobile robot
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 COBALT AI LLC
  • US11445152B2 patent drawing
  • US11445152B2 patent drawing
  • US11445152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile robot is configured for operation in a commercial or industrial setting, such as an office building or retail store. The robot can patrol one or more routes within a building, and can detect violations of security policies by objects, building infrastructure and security systems, or individuals. In response to the detected violations, the robot can perform one or more security operations. The robot can include a removable fabric panel, enabling sensors within the robot body to capture signals that propagate through the fabric. In addition, the robot can scan RFID tags of objects within an area, for instance coupled to store inventory. Likewise, the robot can generate or update one or more semantic maps for use by the robot in navigating an area and for measuring compliance with security policies.