Mobile Robot Hazard Detection for Safer Retail Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail environments face significant costs due to pedestrian injuries from walking hazards, with expenditures for safety and shopping experience improvements often disassociated, leading to high liability and insurance costs.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous mobile robot system equipped with sensors and processing systems for hazard detection and control, capable of mapping navigation paths, detecting hazards, and taking actions to address them, such as alerting personnel and changing routes to prevent injuries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If retail environments purchase autonomous mobile robots for safety and shopping experience improvement, then pedestrian safety and shopping experience are improved, but operational costs and liability expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian safetyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile robot is designed to perform multiple functions: hazard detection using sensors, navigation path planning, autonomous movement to hazardous locations, and alerting personnel through communications. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate safety systems into a single autonomous platform, improving reliability while managing complexity through integration rather than proliferation of separate devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot autonomously detects hazards, navigates to them, and alerts personnel without requiring continuous human supervision or manual operation. The system self-manages the safety monitoring task by independently executing detection, navigation, and communication functions, reducing the need for additional human safety personnel and associated operational costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If separate systems are used for safety and shopping experience improvements, then each function can be optimized independently, but total costs become exorbitant due to disassociated expenditures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidcost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines hazard detection, autonomous navigation, and personnel alerting functions into a single integrated mobile robot system. By merging these previously disassociated safety functions into one coordinated platform, the system achieves cost efficiency through shared infrastructure (sensors, processors, actuators, communications) while maintaining optimized performance for each individual function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile robot serves as a universal platform that handles multiple safety-related tasks: detecting various hazard types using sensor arrays, navigating autonomously to different hazard locations, and communicating alerts to personnel. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate specialized systems for each task, improving cost efficiency while maintaining reliable safety coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260054639A1Apparatus, system, and method of providing hazard detection and control for a mobile robot
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 JABIL INC
  • US20260054639A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054639A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054639A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, system and method capable of providing an autonomous mobile robot hazard detection and control system, including a robot having a robot body; a plurality of sensors physically associated with the robot body capable of detecting a hazardous condition in an operational environment; and at least one processing system at least partially physically associated with the robot body and communicatively connected to the plurality of sensors. The at least one processing system may include non-transitory computing code which, when executed by a processor of the at least one processing system, causes to occur the steps of: mapping a navigation path for the robot to traverse; detecting the hazardous condition along the navigation path based on output from the plurality of sensors; and instructing at least one action by the robot other than following the navigation path, wherein the at least one action at least partially addresses the hazardous condition.