Mobile robot and control method thereof

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile robots, such as domestic cleaners, often cause discomfort due to noise, light, and vibration, especially when users are asleep or engaged in tasks, and existing solutions require manual intervention or fixed disturbance prohibition modes that do not consider the user's current situation or environment changes during recharging.

Innovation Solution

A mobile robot that measures illumination values before and after recharging, comparing them to reference values to determine whether to resume a task, and uses image analysis or electronic appliance operation states to assess the presence of users, adjusting its operation to minimize disturbance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the mobile robot executes cleaning tasks continuously, then productivity is improved, but user disturbance increases due to noise, light, and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning task executionVSAvoiduser disturbance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The robot uses illumination sensors to detect ambient light levels and interprets darkness as a feedback signal that the user may be sleeping or engaged in activities requiring minimal disturbance. Based on this feedback, the robot automatically adjusts its operation by pausing cleaning tasks during dark periods and resuming when illumination levels indicate the user is active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The robot dynamically changes its operational state between active cleaning and paused states based on real-time environmental conditions. The cleaning task execution is made adaptable by continuously monitoring illumination levels and transitioning between different operational modes rather than maintaining a fixed schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If the robot performs recharging during cleaning tasks, then energy sustainability is improved, but task completion time increases and may cause user disturbance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery rechargingVSAvoidtask completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robot monitors battery charge levels in advance and proactively navigates to the charging station before complete power depletion occurs. This preliminary charging action prevents interruption of cleaning tasks and maintains continuous operation, thereby avoiding time loss from mid-task charging interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The robot maintains continuous cleaning operation by performing quick top-up charges during natural pauses in the cleaning path or between rooms. The charging action is integrated into the continuous cleaning workflow rather than being a separate interrupting event, minimizing disruption to task completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of operation

If the robot operates in fixed time-based modes, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to user situation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidresponse to user presence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robot autonomously determines appropriate cleaning schedules by itself interpreting illumination sensor data without requiring user programming or manual mode selection. The system self-adjusts its operation based on detected environmental conditions, eliminating the need for complex user configuration while maintaining high adaptability to actual user situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If the robot resumes cleaning after recharging, then productivity is improved, but user disturbance may increase if the environment has changed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning task completionVSAvoiduser disturbance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before resuming cleaning tasks after charging, the robot again checks illumination levels to confirm the user is still active and no disturbance-sensitive period has begun. This feedback verification ensures that task resumption occurs only when environmentally appropriate, preventing user disturbance while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3930966B1Mobile robot and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP3930966B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3930966B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3930966B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a mobile robot and a control method thereof which are characterized by comparing an illumination in an initial stage of a task with an illumination at a time when recharging performed due to power shortage of a battery is completed, and additionally determining whether or not there is a person in a travel area, thereby determining whether or not the task incompletely executed before the recharging should be subsequently executed.