Mobile Robotic Lab Cart for Coordinated Manual-Automation Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laboratory automation systems are limited in their ability to seamlessly integrate with both automated and manually operated equipment, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in high-throughput screening processes due to lack of data capture and inconsistent timing in manual experiments, which can affect the quality of results.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of auto-navigating robotic processing vehicles that can interact with both automated and manually operated processing stations, equipped with interchangeable end effectors and a control system that schedules and coordinates tasks between human operators and robots, capturing and reporting experiment data to ensure consistency and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual experiments are conducted in high throughput screening, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but data capture consistency and timing accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in experiment conductVSAvoiddata capture consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A mobile robotic processing cart serves as an intermediary between manual experimenters and automated processing stations. The cart includes a robot that can perform automated operations (mixing, stirring, processing) while being manually navigated to different locations. This hybrid approach maintains the flexibility of manual experimentation while introducing automated precision for data capture and timing through the robotic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If fully automated platforms are used for chemical and biological experiments, then productivity and consistency are improved, but adaptability and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment throughputVSAvoidflexibility in experiment conduct
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its level of automation based on experimental needs. The mobile robotic cart can be manually navigated to different locations while the robotic arm performs automated operations. The system can switch between fully manual navigation and automated navigation modes, allowing flexibility in experiment conduct while maintaining high productivity through automated processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If semi-automated systems with automated pipette workstations are used, then productivity is improved, but integration with manually operated equipment becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay processing speedVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile robotic processing cart is designed as a universal platform that can interface with multiple types of processing stations and equipment. The robotic arm can perform various operations (pipetting, mixing, stirring) and the cart can be navigated to different locations to work with different automated and manual equipment. This multi-functionality reduces integration complexity by providing a single versatile interface rather than requiring custom integration for each equipment type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11921127B2Mobile robotic processing cart
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 HIGHRES BIOSOLUTIONS INC
  • US11921127B2 patent drawing
  • US11921127B2 patent drawing
  • US11921127B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laboratory system including a plurality of lab workstations distributed in a lab where each of the plurality of lab workstations is configured to run jobs of a work process, at least one auto-navigating robot processing vehicle that holds a sample holder, and a controller connected to the plurality of lab workstations and the at least one auto-navigating robot processing vehicle. The controller is configured to receive operational job data characterizing each of a number of different jobs that define the work process, receive system data from one or more of the plurality of lab workstations and the at least one auto-navigating robot processing vehicle, and based on the operational job data and the system data, schedule and coordinate each of the number of different jobs that define the work process.