Mobile Scanning Feedback for Real-Time Image Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile scanning devices, such as smartphones, often produce lower quality scanned images due to issues like improper document positioning, inadequate lighting, and background conditions, requiring users to manually adjust settings, which is time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A mobile scanning device equipped with a camera, user interface, memory, and processor that uses a machine learning-based classifier to analyze image quality and provide real-time feedback on how to improve scanning conditions, updating its algorithms based on user interactions to enhance image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual visual examination and adjustment of scanning parameters is used, then user control over scan quality is improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms where the processor analyzes captured images using machine learning classifiers to determine quality metrics, then provides feedback to the user about whether the scan quality is acceptable or what adjustments are needed, eliminating manual visual examination while maintaining quality control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The scanning system performs self-evaluation of image quality through automated algorithms that assess lighting, document positioning, and background conditions, allowing the system to service itself by identifying and reporting quality issues without requiring user expertise or time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of scanning parameters is required, then adaptability to different scanning conditions is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to scanning conditionsVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically assesses scanning conditions including lighting adequacy, document positioning accuracy, and background suitability, then provides targeted feedback to guide users on what to adjust, making the system adaptable to various conditions while remaining easy to operate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning classifier acts as an intermediary between the complex scanning parameters and the user, translating technical quality metrics into simple, actionable feedback that users can understand and implement without needing to understand the underlying technical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple image captures are taken to ensure quality, then scan quality reliability is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan quality reliabilityVSAvoidscanning speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated assessment of image quality immediately after capture using machine learning algorithms, identifying quality issues before the user needs to review them, allowing rapid determination of whether additional captures are needed and maintaining high scanning throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12413849B2Mobile scanning device and method of scanning
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US12413849B2 patent drawing
  • US12413849B2 patent drawing
  • US12413849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device including a camera, a user interface, a memory, and at least one processor. The camera is to capture a plurality of images. The user interface is to display a captured image among the plurality of captured images and to display feedback corresponding to the captured image. The memory is to store feedback data predicting a quality threshold of the plurality of captured images and indicating a type of feedback to be displayed on the user interface corresponding to the captured image. The at least one processor is to display the feedback on the user interface based on whether the captured image is below the predicted quality threshold of the plurality of captured images, the quality threshold being based on the stored feedback data, and update the feedback data stored in the memory based on a comparison between the captured image and the plurality of captured images.