Mobile Search Interface Using Dynamic Control Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search and select user interfaces on mobile devices are inefficient due to limited screen size and input methods, as they often replicate web-based interfaces without considering mobile display and input limitations, leading to cumbersome navigation and space inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A user interface system that generates and updates controls based on single-select or multi-select criteria, using a compressed representation to prioritize results over input parameters, allowing for efficient selection and display on mobile devices, with features like toggle views and in-place value editing to enhance usability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional web-based search and select interfaces are used on mobile devices, then complete search functionality is provided, but screen space is excessively consumed and navigation becomes cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidscreen space consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into collapsible sections where search criteria can be expanded or collapsed based on user needs. Each search parameter group can be independently collapsed to reduce visible screen space while maintaining full functionality when expanded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface transitions from a static web-based layout to a dynamic mobile-optimized layout that adapts to screen space constraints. Controls are dynamically resized and repositioned to be touch-friendly, and the interface can dynamically collapse/expand sections based on interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple search parameters are presented simultaneously, then comprehensive search capability is achieved, but the number of interaction steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch capabilityVSAvoidinteraction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Less commonly used search parameters are extracted from the main view and placed in collapsible sections or accessible via additional controls. This allows the interface to present only essential parameters by default, reducing interaction steps while maintaining full search capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface performs preliminary actions by pre-selecting common search parameters or grouping related parameters together. This reduces the number of individual interaction steps required to conduct a typical search while maintaining the ability to access all parameters when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed search controls are provided for each parameter, then precise search definition is enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch criterion precisionVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different levels of control detail are provided in different parts of the interface. Frequently used parameters receive simple, direct controls, while less common parameters use more compact controls. This local differentiation maintains precision where needed while reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

A universal control pattern is used across all search parameters, where a single interaction mode handles both simple selection and detailed specification. This multi-functional control reduces the number of different control types the user must learn, simplifying the interface while maintaining precise search capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9086783B2Methods and systems for using search and select forms on a mobile device
Publication Date: 2015.07.21 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9086783B2 patent drawing
  • US9086783B2 patent drawing
  • US9086783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide systems and methods for providing and using user interfaces for search and select forms on mobile devices. According to one embodiment, providing a user interface of a search function for an application can comprise generating the user interface including a plurality of controls. Each control can be associated with a search criteria and can provide for a selection of one or more values for the associated search criteria. The user interface can be provided to a mobile device. An indication of a selection of one of the controls can then be received from the mobile device. The user interface can be updated based on the selected control being associated with either a single-select criteria or a multi-select criteria. One or more values for the search criteria associated with the selected control can then be received through the updated user interface.