Mobile Sensor Fusion for Lateral Driving Event Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in accurately detecting and assessing lateral driving behavior, such as aggressive lane changes and swerving, using mobile user device sensors, which are essential for early accident detection and driver behavior evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a set of algorithms and models to collect and process data from mobile device sensors, including inertial and location sensors, to determine lateral acceleration metrics and trigger actions based on detected events, distinguishing between types of lateral movements and filtering out non-risky events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If mobile device sensors are used to detect lateral driving behavior, then the system can provide real-time detection and widespread deployment, but the measurement precision and reliability are insufficient to distinguish risky events from normal driving variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor data streams (accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, GPS) from mobile devices with sophisticated algorithms to create a comprehensive detection system. This merging of multiple data sources compensates for the limitations of individual sensors and improves overall measurement precision while maintaining real-time detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results are continuously refined through algorithmic processing. The algorithms analyze sensor data patterns, compare them against established thresholds, and adjust detection sensitivity based on contextual information, thereby improving measurement precision through iterative feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If the system detects all lateral movements, then it captures comprehensive driving behavior data, but it cannot distinguish between risky events like aggressive lane changes and normal driving maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidevent differentiation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts specific feature parameters from the raw sensor data that are characteristic of risky driving events. By identifying and extracting key features such as lateral acceleration thresholds, duration of events, and pattern recognition markers, the system filters out normal driving variations while capturing risky behaviors, thus preventing information loss despite processing large data volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different analysis criteria and thresholds to different types of driving events. Rather than using a uniform detection approach, it tailors the detection parameters to specific event types (e.g., aggressive lane changes vs. normal lane changes), thereby maintaining accurate event differentiation while processing comprehensive data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system processes detailed sensor data to improve detection accuracy, then measurement precision increases, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary processing steps that prepare sensor data before full analysis. By pre-filtering, pre-classifying, and pre-processing raw sensor streams, the system reduces the complexity of subsequent detailed analysis while maintaining detection accuracy. This preliminary action simplifies the overall system architecture by organizing data flow in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its processing complexity based on detected event characteristics. For routine driving patterns, it uses simplified processing, but automatically increases analysis depth when potentially risky events are detected. This dynamic approach maintains high detection accuracy while minimizing average system complexity and computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate, real-time detection of risky driving behaviors, allowing for dynamic responses, such as insurance score adjustments and alerts, while differentiating between types of lateral events and improving understanding of traffic patterns and risk assessment.

Implementation Method 1

movement data from a accelerometer of the mobile device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

movement data from a gyroscope of the mobile device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 3

movement data from a magnetometer of the mobile device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetometer: Magnetometer

Data Source

PatentUS20230271618A1Method and system for detecting lateral driving behavior
Publication Date: 2023.08.31 CREDIT KARMA LLC
  • US20230271618A1 patent drawing
  • US20230271618A1 patent drawing
  • US20230271618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting lateral driving behavior can include collecting data from a set of sensors; and determining a set of lateral event outcomes S500. Additionally or alternatively, the method can include any or all of: aggregating data; checking for a set of criteria; determining a set of lateral event features; triggering an action based on the set of lateral event outcomes; and/or any other processes. The method can function to detect and assess the (lateral) driving behavior associated with a user.