Mobile Sensor Routing for Air Quality Variance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current environmental monitoring systems face challenges in efficiently collecting and processing air quality data, particularly in capturing temporal and geographic variations, leading to gaps in data coverage and high costs associated with using large numbers of mobile sensors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the partitioning of geographic regions into hexagonal areas based on air quality variance, where mobile sensors are strategically directed to high-information regions and regions with low data variance, optimizing data collection routes and reducing the need for extensive sensor deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a large number of mobile sensors are deployed to collect air quality data across a geographic region, then data coverage and measurement precision are improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair quality data coverageVSAvoidsensor deployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The geographic region is divided into multiple hexagonal zones, each with its own air quality variance characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to manage sensor deployment at a zone level rather than requiring uniform coverage across the entire region, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision through targeted sampling in high-variance zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different sampling strategies to different hexagonal zones based on their local air quality variance characteristics. High-variance zones receive more frequent and intensive sampling, while low-variance zones use reduced sampling rates. This local differentiation optimizes measurement precision where needed while reducing device complexity and cost in stable regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If mobile sensors continuously monitor all regions, then temporal and geographic variations are captured, but energy consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal and geographic data coverageVSAvoidsensor operational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sampling rate for each hexagonal zone is dynamically adjusted based on the calculated air quality variance and information content. Zones with high variance and high information content receive increased sampling frequency, while zones with low variance receive reduced sampling. This dynamic adaptation ensures temporal and geographic variations are captured where they matter most while minimizing energy consumption across the sensor network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the sampling parameter (sampling frequency) based on the information content metric calculated from air quality variance. By adjusting this parameter dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between capturing temporal variations and minimizing energy usage, avoiding continuous monitoring in all regions while preventing data gaps in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If uniform sampling frequency is applied across all geographic regions, then data collection is simplified, but data quality and representativeness deteriorate in high-variance regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoidair quality data representativeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements location-dependent sampling frequencies based on the air quality variance characteristics of each hexagonal zone. High-variance zones are identified and assigned higher sampling rates to ensure data representativeness, while low-variance zones use lower sampling rates. This local differentiation maintains measurement precision in critical areas while preserving operational simplicity through automated variance-based classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor deployment is used to fill spatial and temporal data gaps, then data quality improves, but the cost and complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidnumber of mobile sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring action by concentrating sensor efforts and sampling frequency in hexagonal zones with high information content and high air quality variance, while reducing or eliminating sampling in low-variance zones. This selective approach fills spatial and temporal data gaps in critical areas without requiring comprehensive sensor deployment across the entire geographic region, thereby improving data quality while reducing the quantity of sensors needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240077465A1Drive route selection methodology
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 ACLIMA INC
  • US20240077465A1 patent drawing
  • US20240077465A1 patent drawing
  • US20240077465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, device, and method for sensing air quality with a sensor platform is disclosed. The method includes (i) directing a set of mobile sensors to a coarse region wherein the coarse region has coarse size based on variance of prior air quality measurements taken at locations within a vicinity of the coarse region, and (ii) directing the set of mobile sensors to a fine region wherein the fine region has a fine size based on variance of prior air quality measurements taken at locations within a vicinity of the fine region. The variance of air quality measurements associated with the fine region is greater than a variance of air quality measurements associated with the coarse region.