Personalized Mobile Software Catalog Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile users face inefficiencies in selecting software applications for their devices due to lengthy, non-personalized lists of available options, making it difficult to find applications that align with their interests.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for creating personalized software catalogs for mobile devices by receiving user preferences and filtering or prioritizing available software, allowing users to access a curated selection based on their interests, demographics, and usage history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a complete list of all available applications is presented to all users, then the catalog is comprehensive and contains all possible options, but the catalog becomes excessively long and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of applications in catalogVSAvoidease of finding desired application
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complete application catalog into multiple categories or groups based on user preferences, demographics, and usage history. Instead of presenting one long undifferentiated list, the system divides applications into relevant segments and presents only those segments to each user, making the catalog manageable while maintaining comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-filtering and organizing applications according to user profiles before the user even views the catalog. User preferences, demographic information, and usage history are analyzed in advance to curate a personalized subset of applications, so the user receives a pre-processed, relevant catalog rather than having to search through everything.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the catalog is customized to show only relevant applications for each user, then the selection process becomes easier and more efficient, but the system complexity increases due to preference tracking and filtering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware selection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity for catalog customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically collecting user preferences, demographic data, and usage history, then using this information to autonomously filter and organize the application catalog. The system serves itself by making customization decisions without requiring manual intervention from users to configure filters or categories, thereby improving productivity while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback loops where user interactions with applications, downloads, and usage patterns are continuously monitored and fed back into the preference model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically adjust the catalog customization, improving selection efficiency over time while the complexity is managed through iterative refinement rather than complex upfront configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If user-specific criteria are used to filter the application catalog, then the catalog becomes more relevant to individual users, but the processing required to personalize each catalog increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of application informationVSAvoidprocessing power for catalog personalization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively processing only the most important user-specific criteria rather than analyzing every possible attribute. It focuses on key preference indicators and demographic factors that have the highest impact on application relevance, performing sufficient personalization to maintain information quality without the excessive processing power required for complete analysis of all user data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7409208B1Self-subscription to catalogs of mobile application software
Publication Date: 2008.08.05 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP INC
  • US7409208B1 patent drawing
  • US7409208B1 patent drawing
  • US7409208B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A software download service on a mobile network provides users with personalized catalog presentations identifying software products available for downloading. Customer-specific preferences are established, for example, by input by the customer using a web-interface on a personal computer or on their mobile station, or by processing of user data such as demographics and usage history. The resulting user preferences are stored in a database. When each customer operates a mobile station to access the download service, the listing(s) of available software products are filtered and/or prioritized using the customer's individual preference(s). As a result, the service provides a ‘catalog’ of available software products that has been tailored to the particular user based on that user's preference(s). Consequently, customers can easily find applications that appeal to their interest, which improves both the sales take rate and the customer experience.