Mobile Terminal Memory Card Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Recent mobile terminals, such as smartphones, lack effective anti-theft solutions to prevent unauthorized extraction of memory cards like SIM and SD cards, as existing methods are not adaptable to embedded batteries and often require cumbersome safety modes that users may forget to activate.

Innovation Solution

A mobile terminal with a processing unit and card locking means that locks memory cards when powered on, requiring user authentication through input interfaces like screens, fingerprint scanners, or cameras to unlock, ensuring the card locking mechanism is only accessible upon successful authentication, thus preventing unauthorized extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If card locking means is always locked to prevent theft, then security is improved, but user convenience deteriorates as users cannot easily extract cards when needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-theft protectionVSAvoidcard extraction convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The card locking mechanism transitions from a static always-locked state to a dynamic state that changes based on authentication. The locking means is controlled by a processing unit that receives authentication input from users, allowing the system to adapt between locked and unlocked states. This resolves the contradiction by making the security state dynamic rather than fixed, enabling both strong protection and user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

An authentication interface acts as an intermediary between the user and the card locking mechanism. Instead of directly controlling the lock, users interact with a processing unit through authentication methods (PIN, fingerprint, etc.), which then controls the locking means. This intermediary layer provides both security verification and user-friendly operation, resolving the contradiction between security and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If authentication procedure is required for every card extraction, then security is improved, but operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized extraction preventionVSAvoidauthentication procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication interface serves multiple functions: it authenticates users, controls card locking/unlocking, and can be integrated with existing mobile terminal security features. By making the authentication system universal and multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate complex authentication mechanisms, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining strong security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-service authentication methods that are already familiar to users, such as fingerprint scanners, facial recognition, or PIN codes that are part of the mobile terminal's existing security infrastructure. Users authenticate themselves through their own biometric data or credentials without requiring external assistance or complex procedures, thus maintaining simplicity while improving security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If safety mode is activated to lock battery and prevent shutdown, then anti-theft protection is improved, but user flexibility deteriorates and users may forget to deactivate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal control during theftVSAvoidterminal shutdown flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the security control function from the power management system. Instead of locking the battery and preventing shutdown at the power management level (safety mode), the card locking function is separated and controlled independently through authentication. This allows the terminal to shutdown normally while still protecting the memory card, resolving the contradiction between security and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The security function is segmented into a separate card locking mechanism independent of the power management system. The battery and shutdown controls remain separate from card access controls. This segmentation allows users to shutdown the terminal freely while the card locking mechanism operates independently based on authentication status, eliminating the need for cumbersome safety modes and their associated problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11558748B2Anti-theft mobile terminal and method for controlling the extraction of a memory card out from a mobile terminal
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 ORANGE SA
  • US11558748B2 patent drawing
  • US11558748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed technology relates to a mobile terminal adapted to receive a memory card comprising a processing unit, an input interface and a card locking actuator configured to lock the memory card into the mobile terminal. The card locking actuator is controlled by the processing unit. In one aspect, the card locking actuator is configured to be locked when the mobile terminal is switched on. In another aspect, the processing unit is configured to lock the screen until a screen unlocking authentication procedure is performed by a user at the input interface and is configured to command unlocking of the card locking actuator after detecting that a predetermined authentication procedure is performed by a user at the input interface.