Mobile Unit Data Capture Engine Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mobile units require user intervention to activate multiple applications and perform additional functionalities after data capture, leading to inefficiency, especially when using portable electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A mobile unit with a data capture module that automatically determines and executes further functionalities based on input data and external conditions, using a processor to select the appropriate capture engine and perform a predetermined procedure, thereby streamlining the process without additional user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple applications are manually activated to perform additional functionalities after data capture, then the device can perform multiple functions, but the operation complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoiduser interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and executes further functionalities based on the captured data without requiring user intervention to activate multiple applications. The processor analyzes the captured data and autonomously launches and coordinates the necessary applications, making the system self-serving rather than requiring continuous user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures predetermined procedures that are automatically executed based on the type of data captured. Before the user needs to manually activate applications, the system has already prepared and automatically initiates the appropriate sequence of functionalities, eliminating the need for manual application activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple applications are manually activated to perform additional functionalities, then comprehensive data processing can be achieved, but the time required for operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous automated execution of functionalities without interruption or pause for user intervention. Once data is captured, the processor continuously determines and executes the predetermined procedure, keeping the system in a state of continuous useful action rather than stopping for manual application activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures and automatically executes predetermined procedures based on captured data type, eliminating the time required for manual application activation and navigation. The processor has already determined the appropriate sequence of actions before user input is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the user manually navigates through multiple applications to perform further functionalities, then detailed processing can be performed, but the operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing precisionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor automatically determines which applications to activate and in what sequence, based on the captured data. The system serves itself by autonomously coordinating multiple applications to perform detailed processing without requiring the user to manually navigate through them, thereby maintaining processing precision while dramatically improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple applications are activated for each functionality, then comprehensive functionality coverage is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor is designed with universal capabilities to determine and coordinate multiple different applications based on the captured data type. Rather than requiring separate control mechanisms for each application, the processor serves as a universal controller that can activate and manage any combination of applications needed, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive functionality coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9113235B2Device and method for functionality sequencing
Publication Date: 2015.08.18 SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9113235B2 patent drawing
  • US9113235B2 patent drawing
  • US9113235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and method automatically executes a predetermined procedure. The method includes receiving input data by a mobile unit (MU), the input data including a request for output data, the MU including a data capture module. The method includes obtaining external data using the data capture module, the external data being indicative of at least one external condition related to the MU. The method includes selecting one of at least one capture engine of the data capturing module as a function of the external data and the input data, the selected capture engine configured to obtain the output data. The method includes automatically executing a predetermined procedure using the MU as a function of the selected capture engine and the external data, the predetermined procedure including a plurality of steps, one of the steps being obtaining the output data.