Mobile Warning Filtering for Fixed Rotor False Alarms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile warning systems may erroneously recognize fixed rotors, such as those on outdoor condenser units, as approaching mobile objects, leading to unnecessary warnings.

Innovation Solution

A mobile warning apparatus that calculates relative velocities and determines the proximity of observed points to eliminate those from fixed rotors, thereby reducing false warnings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the warning system monitors all observed points with relative velocity, then mobile objects can be detected, but fixed rotors cause false warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning accuracyVSAvoidfalse warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the observed points into two distinct groups: mobile objects and fixed rotors. This is achieved by analyzing the spatial distribution and velocity characteristics of observed points, separating those that belong to stationary rotating structures from those that are actually moving towards the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of assuming all points with relative velocity are mobile objects, the system inverts the approach by first identifying characteristics of fixed rotors (points clustered around stationary positions with consistent rotational velocity patterns) and eliminating them from warning targets. This reversal of the detection logic effectively reduces false warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the system eliminates points based on proximity, then false warnings from fixed rotors are reduced, but detection of nearby mobile objects may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse warningsVSAvoidmobile object detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different evaluation criteria to different spatial regions. For points in the proximity extent (within a predetermined distance from the vehicle), the system checks whether they belong to fixed rotors using specific velocity and position relationships. For points outside this extent, standard mobile object detection applies. This localized quality control ensures accurate differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary classification step between raw observation and warning generation. The eliminator acts as a mediator that uses velocity calculator and position determiner data to identify and remove fixed rotor points before the final warning decision, preventing false warnings while preserving genuine mobile object detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12325444B2Mobile warning apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 DENSO CORP
  • US12325444B2 patent drawing
  • US12325444B2 patent drawing
  • US12325444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile warning apparatus according to one aspect of the present disclosure includes a velocity calculator, a position determiner, and an eliminator. The velocity calculator calculates one or more relative velocities of one or more observed points. The position determiner determines whether the observed points are in a predetermined proximity extent. The eliminator eliminates, in response to determination that the observed points are in the predetermined proximity extent, all the observed points from a warning target.