Mobility Device Stability Control via Inertial Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobility devices for physically disabled individuals often compromise between stability and ease of locomotion, particularly when navigating stairs or uneven terrain, and lack advanced safety features and payload capacity.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, redundant mobility device with an inertial measurement system, advanced heat management, ergonomically positioned shock-buffered caster wheels, automatic mode transitions, remote control capabilities, and a vehicle locking mechanism, along with long-lived batteries and ride management bumpers, to enhance stability and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stability features are enhanced to maintain balance on uneven terrain, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent modules including inertial measurement unit, processing unit, and motor control units. Each module performs specific functions independently, allowing the system to maintain stability through distributed control while keeping individual components manageable and replaceable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors orientation and predicts potential instability conditions before they occur. The control algorithm proactively adjusts motor commands to prevent tipping or loss of balance, rather than reacting after instability begins, thereby enhancing reliability through preventive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If redundant components are added to enhance safety and reliability, then reliability improves, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensor inputs from the inertial measurement unit are processed by a single integrated processing unit that coordinates all redundancy systems. The control system merges information from multiple sources to make unified control decisions, achieving enhanced reliability without proportionally increasing overall system weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operational parameters such as motor power distribution and stability thresholds based on real-time sensor data. By changing control parameters rather than adding physical components, the system achieves adaptive safety responses without increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If advanced control systems with multiple sensors are implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation sensingVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing unit performs multiple functions including sensor data acquisition, orientation calculation, stability prediction, and motor control command generation. This multi-functional approach allows precise orientation measurement while consolidating control logic into a single unit, preventing exponential growth in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the device is designed to accommodate increased payload, then versatility improves, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload capacityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts motor output and stability parameters based on detected payload conditions. The inertial measurement unit identifies changes in center of gravity and mass distribution, and the processing unit adapts control commands in real-time, allowing the device to handle varied payloads without requiring heavy structural reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mobility device provides improved stability, safety, and performance, enabling users to navigate various terrains and obstacles while accommodating increased payloads and offering enhanced user control and convenience.

Implementation Method 1

an inertial measurement system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

determining the corrective action to maintain stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

ergonomically positioned and shock buffered caster wheel assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock buffering: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3458007B1Mobility device
Publication Date: 2022.08.17 DEKA PRODUCTS LP
  • EP3458007B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3458007B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3458007B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A powered balancing mobility device that can provide the user the ability to safely navigate expected environments of daily living including the ability to maneuver in confined spaces and to climb curbs, stairs, and other obstacles, and to travel safely and comfortably in vehicles. The mobility device can provide elevated, balanced travel.