Mobility Score Map Fusion for Outdoor Terrain-Aware Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems using 2D LiDAR struggle to recognize outdoor terrains as obstacles, leading to potential accidents and hardware damage, as they fail to differentiate between drivable and non-drivable areas.

Innovation Solution

A method of generating a score map by merging a vector map with a terrain-based score map, incorporating obstacle, general, and special terrain types, and using this map to control driving routes, avoiding hazardous zones and optimizing speed and torque instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a 2D LiDAR-based driving route plan is used, then the mobility can operate in stable indoor environments, but it fails to recognize outdoor terrains accurately, leading to potential accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidterrain recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D LiDAR data to 3D terrain information by introducing elevation data and vertical dimension analysis. The system calculates terrain scores based on height differences, slopes, and vertical obstacles, enabling the mobility to recognize outdoor terrains accurately without adding physical sensors by utilizing the Z-dimension in map data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a terrain score map as an intermediary layer between the raw map data and the path planning algorithm. This score map translates complex 3D terrain characteristics into simplified numerical scores that the path planner can process, effectively mediating between detailed terrain information and decision-making systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the mobility uses basic obstacle detection, then the system complexity remains low, but it misclassifies drivable terrains as obstacles or fails to identify non-drivable areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidterrain classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the terrain classification into multiple score categories (e.g., safe, cautious, prohibited) based on different terrain characteristics. Each terrain cell is evaluated independently with specific scoring rules for obstacles, slopes, and special terrains, allowing complex classification without requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from binary obstacle/non-obstacle to continuous terrain scores. By evaluating multiple parameters (elevation change, slope angle, terrain type) and combining them into composite scores, the system achieves accurate terrain classification while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the mobility plans routes without considering terrain scores, then the path planning is simple and fast, but it may select hazardous routes that damage the vehicle or reduce its lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning efficiencyVSAvoidvehicle lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary terrain score calculation and route evaluation before final path selection. By pre-computing terrain scores for all relevant cells and evaluating multiple candidate routes with penalty scores, the system ensures safe route selection without adding significant computational overhead during real-time operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where terrain scores and route penalties are continuously updated based on the mobility's position and surrounding conditions. The path planning algorithm uses this feedback to adjust route selection, avoiding hazardous areas while maintaining efficient navigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250216218A1Method of generating score map, method of controlling driving, and system of controlling driving for mobility
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250216218A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216218A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216218A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of generating a score map for a mobility can include loading, by a controller of the mobility, a local map including a plurality of cells, scanning, by a surrounding environment scanning unit mounted on the mobility, a surrounding environment of the mobility, recognizing, by the controller, a surrounding terrain of the mobility from information on the surrounding environment of the mobility, generating, by the controller, a first score map corresponding to the terrain, generating, by the controller, a vector map corresponding to the terrain, converting, by the controller, the vector map to a second score map, and generating, by the controller, a final score map based on the first score map and the second score map. A method can further include controlling driving for a mobility. A system of controlling driving of a mobility by using the final score map is also disclosed.