Mode I DCB Fixture Using Drill Jig and Rotating Pin Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current method for preparing Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) specimens is time-intensive and expensive, requiring hand sanding, volatile solvent cleaning, and extensive adhesive application, which prolongs the specimen preparation time to approximately a week.

Innovation Solution

A drill jig is used to precisely locate and drill holes in the DCB specimens, eliminating the need for hand sanding and volatile solvent cleaning, and a rotating pin block system applies the fracturing load internally, reducing preparation time and eliminating potential fracture points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional adhesive bonding method is used to attach hinges to DCB specimens, then the specimen can be assembled for testing, but the preparation time increases to approximately a week and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecimen assembly reliabilityVSAvoidspecimen preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the adhesive bonding process entirely from the specimen preparation. Instead of bonding hinges to the DCB specimen, the invention uses a drilling method that creates holes through the specimen, allowing pins to be inserted directly without any adhesive, masking, or bonding jig requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical adhesive bonding system with a mechanical drilling and pin insertion system. The drilling method creates precise holes that accommodate pins, eliminating the need for adhesive application, curing time, and bonding fixtures while achieving reliable mechanical connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional adhesive bonding method is used to attach hinges to DCB specimens, then the specimen can be assembled for testing, but the manufacturing complexity and costs increase due to multiple preparation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecimen assembly reliabilityVSAvoidspecimen preparation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the adhesive bonding process entirely from the specimen preparation. Instead of bonding hinges to the DCB specimen, the invention uses a drilling method that creates holes through the specimen, allowing pins to be inserted directly without any adhesive, masking, or bonding jig requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical adhesive bonding system with a mechanical drilling and pin insertion system. The drilling method creates precise holes that accommodate pins, eliminating the need for adhesive application, curing time, and bonding fixtures while achieving reliable mechanical connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If traditional external load application method with hinges is used, then the DCB test can be performed, but potential fracture points are introduced at the bond lines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest execution easeVSAvoidfracture load application reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent nests the load application mechanism inside the specimen structure. Instead of attaching external hinges to the outside surfaces, the drilling method creates holes within the specimen thickness, and pins are inserted through these holes, nesting the rotation mechanism inside the specimen body rather than on the exterior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the hinges from the external bonding system and replaces them with internal pin mechanisms created through drilling. This eliminates the bond lines between hinges and specimen, removing the fracture points that would occur at the adhesive interfaces during loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11298754B1Mode I fracture testing fixture
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US11298754B1 patent drawing
  • US11298754B1 patent drawing
  • US11298754B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for preparing Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) specimens are disclosed as an apparatus and method for conducting Mode I fracture resistance testing using the DCB specimens. In a first embodiment, a drill jig is used to locate the DCB specimen and guide a drilling process during creation of at least one through-hole in the DCB specimen. The drilling process may employ a traditional drill and drill bit, a laser drill, or a water jet. In another embodiment, a set of rotating pin blocks, each with a full-round or a half-round specimen pin at one end and a hanger full-round pin at the other end, engage the DCB specimen and facilitate the internal application of a fracturing load to the DCB specimen for the Mode I fracture resistance test. The present invention may significantly reduce the time and materials needed to prepare and test a DCB specimen.