Mode S Radar Interrogation Density Characterization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for characterizing Mode S interrogations in air traffic control radar systems are inefficient, relying on expensive calibration flights and limited temporal measurements, which do not account for all possible interrogation combinations and lead to reduced radar effectiveness due to transponder saturation and over-interrogation.

Innovation Solution

A method to detect and characterize Mode S targets by synchronous and asynchronous responses, determining response rates in spatial cells, and identifying sources of asynchronous responses to assess interrogation density and transponder blocking, enabling more precise adjustment of radar operations to prevent over-interrogation and improve surveillance safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If calibration flights with specialist aircraft are used to measure interrogation rates, then measurement accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrogation rate measurement accuracyVSAvoidtime for calibration flights
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a virtual model of the radar environment that replicates real interrogation scenarios without requiring physical calibration flights. The system creates a digital copy of the radar's interrogation patterns and transponder responses, allowing measurements to be performed in simulation rather than in actual flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the radar's own operational data and existing transponder responses to characterize interrogation density. Instead of requiring external calibration aircraft, the radar analyzes its own interrogation patterns and the responses it receives, turning the measurement process into a self-service operation that occurs during normal radar operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If transponders operate at maximum response capacity, then detection availability is improved, but transponder saturation occurs leading to non-response to selective interrogations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransponder detection availabilityVSAvoidtransponder response capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors transponder response rates and interrogation densities, providing feedback to adjust radar operations. When transponders approach saturation, the system detects this through analysis of response patterns and adjusts interrogation rates or redistributes radar resources to maintain reliable detection without causing saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by not always interrogating all transponders at maximum capacity. Instead, it selectively adjusts interrogation rates based on local density conditions, using only the necessary portion of transponder capacity required for reliable detection while avoiding saturation in high-density areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Area of stationary object

If radar beams rotate with standard periods, then coverage is maintained, but measurement of interrogation density is limited to single phase offset states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar coverage areaVSAvoidtemporal interrogation combination coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts radar beam rotation periods and phase offsets to sample different temporal interrogation combinations. By varying the rotation timing, the system can observe how interrogation density changes with different phase relationships between multiple radars, providing comprehensive characterization across all possible temporal configurations rather than being limited to a single fixed rotation pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11635508B2Method for characterizing the density of mode S interrogations and responses and secondary radar implementing such a method
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 THALES SA
  • US11635508B2 patent drawing
  • US11635508B2 patent drawing
  • US11635508B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A density of Mode S interrogations and responses in the environment covered by a secondary radar is characterized according to the following steps: a first step wherein the radar: detects and locates Mode S targets by way of their synchronous responses to the interrogations emitted by the radar; detects asynchronous responses emitted by the Mode S targets, and not elicited by the radar; for each target, associates its asynchronous responses with its synchronous response to the radar; a second step wherein the radar: based on the association, determines the response rate of each target by counting the number of synchronous and asynchronous responses received from the target per given time period; with the environment being divided into elementary space cells, determines the response rate per cell by counting the number of synchronous and asynchronous responses received by each target in each cell, the rate characterizing the density of Mode S interrogations per cell.