Model-Based Decentralized Control for Compressed Air System Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling and monitoring compressed air generation, treatment, and distribution systems rely heavily on central control units, which can be overwhelmed by data demands and lack precision in diagnosis and monitoring.

Innovation Solution

A method and electronic control device that utilize component-specific models to evaluate operational data, allowing for precise control, regulation, diagnosis, and monitoring by using models that adapt to the component's structure and behavior, enabling self-learning and comparison with actual data to identify malfunctions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central control unit controls and monitors a large number of components for compressed air generation and/or treatment, then comprehensive system control is achieved, but the control unit becomes overburdened and data flow requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol unit burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into decentralized control units, each responsible for specific components (compressors, dryers, filters). Each control unit independently manages its assigned components using local models and sensor data, eliminating the need for a single overloaded central control unit while maintaining comprehensive system control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces model-based evaluation routines as intermediaries between sensors and control decisions. These models process sensor data locally at each control unit, transforming raw data into meaningful operational insights and control actions without requiring all data to flow through a central unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If component-related models are used to determine, replicate or evaluate operationally relevant data, then control and diagnosis precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to model implementation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational data evaluation precisionVSAvoidmodel-based control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of component behavior through mathematical models that replicate the operational characteristics of physical components. These model copies enable precise evaluation of operational data, prediction of component behavior, and diagnosis of malfunctions without adding physical complexity to the actual hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex control problems into manageable parameter comparisons by evaluating model predictions against actual sensor measurements. This approach converts complex system behavior analysis into straightforward parameter matching and deviation detection, simplifying the control logic while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If alternative evaluations with different malfunction configurations are performed for diagnosis, then diagnosis accuracy is improved, but evaluation time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis accuracyVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures multiple malfunction models representing different failure modes before actual diagnosis is needed. These models are prepared in advance with their characteristic behavior patterns, enabling rapid comparison against actual sensor data during diagnosis without requiring time-consuming analysis of failure mechanisms during the diagnostic process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates multiple malfunction scenarios simultaneously by comparing sensor data against several pre-configured models in parallel. This excessive evaluation approach ensures that the correct malfunction is identified even if some models are initially considered, while the model that best matches the actual behavior emerges as the diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4224016B1Electronic control device for a component of compressed air generation, compressed air conditioning, compressed air storage and / or compressed air distribution
Publication Date: 2026.04.15 KAESER KOMPRESSOREN SE
  • EP4224016B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4224016B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4224016B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Electronic control device for a component of compressed air generation, compressed air treatment, compressed air storage and/or compressed air distribution, wherein the electronic control device (11) uses one or more models, which contain relevant information as component-related models for the structure or behavior of the component (12), to determine, replicate or evaluate operationally relevant data, and, based on the models, performs in a specific evaluation routine either - control, regulation, diagnosis and/or monitoring of the component or - determination, provision, prediction or optimization of operational data, operating states, operating modes, operational behavior and/or operational effects, and wherein, at least partially available in the electronic control device, current or historical structural information, operational data,Operating states and/or measurement/sensor values ​​of the component are used.