Model-Based Vehicle Navigation Using Physics Model
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing vehicle navigation systems for small, lightweight aircraft, such as those in Urban Air Mobility, rely on navigation grade inertial sensors for accurate velocity and attitude feedback, which are bulky and expensive, and require off-vehicle navigation aids like GNSS, limiting their availability and accuracy.
Innovation Solution
A model-based navigation system that uses a strapdown navigation processor, a propagator-estimator filter, and a vehicle physics model to generate navigation solutions without navigation grade inertial sensors or off-vehicle aids, by inputting inertial sensor data and platform inputs to calculate and correct navigation errors, utilizing dynamics equations for a rigid body to predict translational acceleration measurements.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If navigation grade inertial sensors are used to provide accurate velocity and attitude feedback, then navigation accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a physics model as an intermediary component that bridges the gap between low-grade sensor measurements and accurate navigation solutions. The physics model processes data from tactical or industrial grade inertial sensors (which are less expensive and smaller) and transforms it into navigation-grade accuracy by incorporating vehicle dynamics equations, mass properties, and aerodynamic characteristics. This intermediary model allows the system to achieve navigation accuracy previously requiring expensive navigation grade sensors without directly using them.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical approach of using high-precision physical sensors with a computational/algorithmic approach. Instead of relying on expensive navigation grade inertial sensors to directly provide accurate measurements, the system uses a physics-based computational model that processes measurements from lower-grade sensors through mathematical transformations and vehicle dynamics equations to achieve the same navigation accuracy. This substitution of mechanical sensor precision with computational modeling resolves the contradiction between accuracy and device complexity.
2Measurement precision
If navigation grade inertial sensors are used to ensure accurate velocity feedback, then measurement precision is improved, but weight and volume increase
Solution Approach 1:
The physics model acts as an intermediary that enables the use of lighter, less expensive tactical or industrial grade inertial sensors while still achieving navigation-grade velocity feedback accuracy. The model compensates for the reduced precision of the lower-grade sensors through computational processing, effectively mediating between the weight constraints and accuracy requirements.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs cheaper, lighter inertial sensors (tactical or industrial grade) that may have shorter operational lifetimes or lower precision characteristics, and compensates for these limitations through the physics model. The approach accepts that the raw sensor data is not perfect but transforms it into acceptable navigation solutions through computational correction, thereby reducing the weight and cost penalty associated with navigation grade sensors.
3Measurement precision
If off-vehicle navigation aids like GNSS are used to provide navigation corrections, then measurement precision is improved, but adaptability to environments without such aids deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a self-service navigation capability where the vehicle uses its own physics model and onboard sensors to generate navigation corrections without requiring external GNSS aids. The physics model processes data from the vehicle's inertial sensors and platform inputs to autonomously compute navigation solutions and corrections. This self-service approach enables the system to operate independently in environments where GNSS is unavailable, significantly improving environmental adaptability while maintaining navigation accuracy through onboard computational resources.
Solution Approach 2:
The physics model serves as an intermediary that enables navigation operations in GNSS-denied environments by providing the necessary navigation corrections through onboard computational processing. Instead of relying on external GNSS signals as an intermediary, the system uses the physics model as an intermediary that transforms raw sensor data into navigation-grade corrections autonomously, thereby achieving both accuracy and environmental adaptability.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods for model based vehicle navigation are provided. In one embodiment, a navigation system: a strapdown navigation processor; a propagator-estimator filter, the navigation processor configured to input inertial sensor data and navigation corrections from the filter to generate a navigation solution comprising a vehicle velocity estimate and a vehicle attitude estimate; a vehicle physics model configured to perform calculations utilizing dynamics equations for a rigid body. The model inputs 1) vehicle state estimates from the navigation solution and 2) platform inputs indicative of forces acting on a vehicle platform. The model outputs a set of three orthogonal predicted translational acceleration measurements based on the inputs. The filter comprises a measurement equation associated with the model and is configured to input the navigation solution and inertial sensor data, and to input and process the translational acceleration measurements as a navigation aid to generate the navigation corrections.

