3D Model Compensation for Additive Manufacturing Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques face challenges in predicting and compensating for geometric deformation of 3D objects during the printing process, leading to inaccuracies and errors in the final product.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven end-to-end machine learning architecture is employed, utilizing deep neural networks to predict and compensate for geometric deformation by training deformation and compensation machine learning models in an adversarial or serial manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional additive manufacturing techniques are used without deformation compensation, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the geometric precision and accuracy of the final part deteriorate due to uncorrected deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric precisionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary deformation prediction using machine learning models before the actual printing process. The predicted deformation is used to generate compensated toolpaths that pre-correct for anticipated geometric deviations, allowing the final part to achieve higher precision without requiring complex real-time intervention during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual deformation measurements from printed parts are fed back into the machine learning models to continuously improve prediction accuracy. This closed-loop approach enables the system to learn from past performance and progressively enhance geometric precision while maintaining manageable process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained in an adversarial manner to predict deformation, then prediction accuracy improves, but the training process and model complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system is segmented into specialized components: deformation prediction models that forecast geometric deviations, compensation models that calculate corrective transformations, and transformation models that generate adjusted toolpaths. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function, improving overall prediction accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts model parameters and hyperparameters during training based on performance metrics and data characteristics. By automatically tuning parameters such as learning rates, network depths, and regularization strengths, the system achieves high prediction accuracy without requiring manual intervention to manage model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If compensated toolpaths are generated based on predicted deformation, then the final part accuracy improves, but the computational time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Deformation prediction and compensation calculations are performed before the printing process begins, allowing sufficient computational time to be allocated without delaying production. The compensated toolpaths are generated in advance and stored for use during manufacturing, eliminating the need for real-time computation that would slow down the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex iterative mechanical adjustment processes with machine learning-based predictive modeling. By using trained models to directly predict deformation and generate compensation transformations, the system achieves high part accuracy much faster than traditional trial-and-error or iterative optimization approaches would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250094674A1Model compensations
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US20250094674A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094674A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094674A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of methods are described herein. In some examples, a method includes generating, using a compensation machine learning model after training, a compensated model based on a three-dimensional (3D) object model. In some examples, the compensation machine learning model is trained by generating candidate compensation plans and evaluating, using a deformation machine learning model, the candidate compensation plans. In some examples, the method includes adjusting the 3D object model based on the compensated model to produce an adjusted model.