Model Control Scheme Switching for Industrial Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial automation environments face challenges in leveraging operational data for real-time insights due to the vast amount of data generated and the complexity of manually editing control programs to optimize industrial processes.

Innovation Solution

Integration of machine learning models within industrial control code to optimize parameters such as performance, yield, and energy conservation, allowing for autonomous adjustments and improvements in industrial processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine learning models are integrated into industrial control code to optimize parameters, then productivity and manufacturing precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindustrial process optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary components between operational data and control decisions. These models process complex data patterns and translate them into actionable control parameters, enabling optimization without directly complicating the core control system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into modular components: data collection modules, machine learning model modules, and execution modules. Each model control scheme is an independent, interchangeable unit that can be selected and deployed without redesigning the entire control system, managing complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple model control schemes are maintained for different parameters, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization flexibilityVSAvoidmodel management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal model management architecture that can handle multiple different model control schemes through a common interface and selection mechanism. This universal framework allows the system to adapt to different optimization parameters (performance, yield, energy conservation) without requiring separate management systems for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and switches between different model control schemes based on current operational conditions and optimization goals. The model management component can change which model is active in real-time, providing adaptability while keeping the actual number of simultaneously active models limited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If manual editing of control programs is performed to optimize processes, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimization accuracyVSAvoidcontrol program editing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Machine learning models are pre-trained on historical operational data to learn optimal control strategies for various scenarios. This preliminary training phase captures expert knowledge and optimization patterns, so that during runtime, the system can directly apply these pre-learned optimizations without requiring manual analysis and editing of control programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses machine learning models to automatically generate and adjust control parameters based on operational data, eliminating the need for manual intervention. The models self-service the optimization function by continuously learning from data and autonomously adjusting control strategies to maintain manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250138494A1Leveraging model control schemes for parameter optimization within industrial automation environments
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US20250138494A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138494A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138494A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present technology generally relate to solutions for integrating machine learning models into industrial automation environments. More specifically, embodiments of the present technology include systems and methods for implementing machine learning models within industrial control code to improve performance, increase productivity, and add capability to existing control programs. In an embodiment, a system comprises: a storage component configured to maintain a set of model control schemes for controlling an industrial process, a control component configured to control the industrial process with a control program running a model control scheme, wherein the model control scheme is configured to optimize a first parameter of the industrial process, and a model management component configured to change the model control scheme to optimize a second parameter of the industrial process that is distinct from the first parameter.