Model Ensemble Refinement via Bayesian Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current modeling techniques face significant uncertainty in selecting appropriate domain-specific interpretations and mathematical systems, leading to errors and risks in predicting and forecasting events, as they do not provide feedback to refine individual models within ensembles, despite the use of aggregate prediction methods like Bayesian Model Averaging for improved accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that statistically analyze multiple model outputs using Bayesian analysis and feedback loops to provide comparative information back to the models, allowing for the refinement and improvement of individual models within ensembles, using Bayesian Model Aggregation (BMA) and statistical methods like analysis of variance to identify and hold constant models that closely match the aggregate estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If aggregate prediction methods like Bayesian Model Averaging are used to improve predictive accuracy, then the overall prediction performance is improved, but there is no feedback mechanism to refine and improve the individual models within the ensemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidfeedback information for model refinement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the aggregate model's predictions are compared with individual model predictions, and this comparative information is fed back to refine the individual models. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high predictive accuracy through aggregation while simultaneously providing feedback to improve individual model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the aggregate model into individual constituent models and analyzes their contributions separately. By decomposing the aggregate prediction into individual model components and evaluating their performance relative to the aggregate, the system identifies which individual models need refinement while maintaining the overall predictive accuracy of the ensemble.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple individual models are used to explore different portions of hypothesis space, then model selection uncertainty is addressed, but the complexity of the modeling system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection robustnessVSAvoidensemble model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual models into a unified aggregate model framework using Bayesian Model Averaging. This approach maintains the reliability benefits of exploring multiple hypotheses while managing complexity by providing a unified probabilistic framework that automatically weights and combines individual models based on their performance and uncertainty characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9569732B2System and method of designing models in a feedback loop
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US9569732B2 patent drawing
  • US9569732B2 patent drawing
  • US9569732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for designing models is disclosed. The method includes selecting a plurality of models for modeling a common event of interest. The method further includes aggregating the results of the models and analyzing each model compared to the aggregate result to obtain comparative information. The method also includes providing the information back to the plurality of models to design more accurate models through a feedback loop.