Model Fitness Scoring for Stable Automated Model Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data analytics systems struggle with generating models that accurately reflect diverse customer needs and adapt to changing business processes, while manual model tuning is costly and model drift risk leads to unstable decision boundaries.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining model fitness and stability using automated model generation, which includes a model fitness and stability component that provides deployability scores and flags, and mitigates model drift risk through automated model selection and scoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual model tuning is performed to generate accurate models for diverse customer needs, then model accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated model generation and selection that performs model tuning autonomously without requiring manual expert intervention. The automated system evaluates multiple models, selects the best-performing ones, and deploys them automatically, enabling the system to serve itself in the model development process while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts model parameters and hyperparameters through automated generation processes, evaluating multiple parameter configurations to identify optimal settings. This automated parameter optimization achieves high model accuracy without the time-consuming manual tuning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual model tuning is performed to generate accurate models for diverse customer needs, then model accuracy is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The automated model generation system performs model development, evaluation, and selection autonomously without requiring expensive manual expert intervention. The system self-manages the entire model development lifecycle, significantly reducing the cost associated with manual tuning while maintaining or improving model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates multiple model variations and copies through automated processes, evaluating them systematically to identify the best-performing models. This automated model generation approach replaces expensive manual model creation with cost-effective automated replication and evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated model generation is implemented to reduce manual intervention, then productivity is improved, but model stability may deteriorate due to model drift risk

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmodel stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated monitoring and evaluation mechanisms that continuously assess model performance and detect drift. The feedback loop identifies when generated models diverge from expected performance, triggering re-evaluation and re-generation of models to maintain stability while preserving productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation and validation of generated models before deployment, assessing their stability and performance characteristics in advance. This preliminary action filters out unstable models and ensures only robust models are deployed, maintaining stability while enabling automated high-productivity model generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple models are generated to address diverse customer needs and changing business processes, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated model generation system serves multiple functions including model creation, evaluation, selection, and deployment within a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach handles diverse customer needs and varying business requirements through one unified system, achieving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates multiple model variations through automated copying and modification processes, creating specialized models for different customers and business scenarios. This automated model replication approach enables high adaptability to diverse needs while keeping the underlying generation logic standardized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12585506B2System and method for determination of model fitness and stability for model deployment in automated model generation
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US12585506B2 patent drawing
  • US12585506B2 patent drawing
  • US12585506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with an embodiment, described herein are systems and methods for use with a computing environment, for providing a determination of model fitness and stability, for model deployment and automated model generation. A model fitness and stability component can provide one or more features that support model selection, use of a model deployability score and deployability flag, and mitigation of model drift risk, to determine model fitness and stability for a particular application. For example, embodiments may be used with analytic applications, data analytics, or other types of computing environments, to provide, for example, a directly actionable risk prediction, in finance applications or other types of applications.