Model Generalization in Wireless Communication Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in model generalization, where AI or ML models designed for specific functions or features may perform poorly when applied to different functions or feature groups, leading to decreased accuracy and efficiency, and generalizing these models across multiple functions results in increased size, making them unusable by user equipment (UE).

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining and filtering generalization information associated with models or model structures by UE and network nodes, transmitting UE capability information to determine the applicability and support of models, and adjusting model activation, deactivation, or switching to balance generalization and model size, allowing UEs to use models that are generalized across functions while remaining loadable.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If AI or ML models are generalized across multiple functions or feature groups, then model versatility and applicability are improved, but model size increases making them unusable by user equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel generalizationVSAvoidmodel size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a large generalized model into multiple smaller specialized models, each optimized for specific functions or feature groups. The UE can selectively load and use only the required smaller models based on current communication needs, reducing memory requirements while maintaining the ability to access specialized functionality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a framework where multiple specialized models work together to provide universal coverage across different communication functions. Each model is designed for a specific function but the collective system achieves broad applicability, allowing UEs to benefit from specialized optimization without requiring a single large universal model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Weight of moving object

If AI or ML models are designed for specific functions, then model size is reduced for UE usability, but model performance deteriorates when applied to different functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel sizeVSAvoidmodel performance across functions
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model selection and switching mechanisms that allow the system to adaptively choose the most appropriate specialized model based on current communication conditions, required functions, and UE capabilities. This dynamic approach enables specialized models to effectively serve multiple functions through context-aware selection rather than requiring each model to be universally optimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a model management layer that acts as an intermediary between specialized models and communication functions. This intermediary handles model selection, configuration, and coordination, allowing specialized models to be effectively applied to different functions through proper mediation and adaptation rather than direct application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If generalized models are configured for UEs, then model applicability across functions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel applicabilityVSAvoidmodel configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where UEs automatically perform model selection, configuration, and optimization based on their own capabilities, current communication needs, and available resources. The system autonomously manages model deployment without requiring complex manual configuration, reducing device complexity while maintaining broad model applicability through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops that monitor model performance, UE resource usage, and communication conditions to continuously optimize model configuration. This feedback-driven approach automatically adjusts model deployment strategies based on real-world performance data, simplifying configuration management while improving model applicability through continuous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240098484A1Model generalization
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240098484A1 patent drawing
  • US20240098484A1 patent drawing
  • US20240098484A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may obtain generalization information associated with a model, a model structure (MS), or a parameter set (PS) associated with the model. The UE may initiate a connection to a network node. The UE may filter the model, the MS, or the PS based at least in part on the generalization information. The UE may transmit UE capability information to the network node, based at least in part on filtering the model, the MS or the PS, that indicates whether the model, the MS, or the PS is applicable, available, or supported by the UE. Numerous other aspects are described.