Model Health Scoring with Variable Drift Alerts for Real-Time Decay Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern systems lack real-time understanding of model performance decay and fail to identify root causes of prediction viability, leading to delayed detection of model degradation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining a model health score by analyzing model variables, calculating contribution indexes, and generating alerts based on drift scores to assess model performance and identify potential decay.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional model evaluation methods are used, then model performance can be assessed after a threshold number of days, but real-time detection of model performance decay is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance detection timelinessVSAvoiddelay in detecting model degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing expected contribution indexes for each model variable before deployment. These pre-calculated benchmarks enable real-time comparison against actual contributions, allowing immediate detection of performance decay without waiting for traditional evaluation periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring actual variable contributions against expected contribution indexes in real-time. When drift scores indicate deviations beyond thresholds, the system generates alerts and performs root cause analysis, creating a closed-loop feedback mechanism that enables timely detection and response to model performance decay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If comprehensive model analysis is performed to identify root causes, then prediction viability can be understood, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identification capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex model analysis task into manageable components: (1) calculating expected contribution indexes for each variable, (2) computing drift scores for individual variables, (3) performing root cause analysis only on variables exceeding drift thresholds. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive root cause identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by focusing detailed analysis only on specific variables that exhibit significant drift scores rather than uniformly analyzing all model variables. This selective approach maintains high root cause identification capability while reducing computational complexity and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring of all model variables is implemented, then model health can be continuously assessed, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous model health monitoringVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by establishing drift score thresholds that determine when full analysis is triggered. Instead of continuously analyzing all variables at maximum depth, the system adjusts its monitoring intensity based on whether variables exceed predefined drift thresholds, enabling continuous health assessment while optimizing computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by monitoring all model variables for drift but conducting detailed root cause analysis only on variables that exceed drift thresholds. This approach maintains continuous model health monitoring capability while avoiding the excessive computational resource consumption that would result from analyzing all variables at full depth continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250231857A1Systems, methods, and non-transitory computer readable medium for determining a model health score
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC
  • US20250231857A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231857A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231857A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for generating a model health score includes a memory storing computer-executable instructions and a processor configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to cause the system to perform selecting a model of a plurality of models to analyze, selecting a prediction from a plurality of predictions where the selected model was executed, and determining a model health score for the selected model. The selected model includes a plurality of variables and the model health score is based on at least a subset of the plurality of variables. The model health score indicates viability of the selected model for the selected prediction.