Biosensor Binding Curve Analysis Without Model Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing biosensor systems rely on specific interaction models for evaluating molecular interactions, which are limited to certain types of interactions and often discard valuable data, leading to unreliable results for interactions that do not fit these models.

Innovation Solution

A method and biosensor system that evaluates interactions independently of theoretical models by comparing sample binding curves to a reference binding curve, considering all registered data points, and classifying interactions based on predefined deviation criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If model-based evaluation methods are used to derive interaction parameters from binding curves, then reliable results are obtained for interactions that fit specific models, but the method becomes limited to specific interaction types and cannot provide reliable results for interactions that do not fit the model

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of interaction parametersVSAvoidapplicability to different interaction types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating an evaluation method that works for all interaction types without requiring specific model fitting. The system compares binding curves to reference curves using deviation analysis, making it applicable to diverse analyte-ligand interactions including those that don't fit traditional models like 1:1 binding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by instead of fitting data to theoretical models, it compares experimental binding curves to reference binding curves and evaluates based on deviation. This inversion allows model-independent evaluation while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If report points at predetermined points in the binding curve are used for evaluation, then the evaluation process is simplified, but only information at specific points is used and a majority of the information in the binding curves is discarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of evaluation processVSAvoidinformation discarded from binding curves
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies continuity by utilizing all data points throughout the entire binding curve for evaluation, not just discrete report points. The deviation analysis continuously compares the sample binding curve to the reference binding curve across all measured time points, preserving all information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameter from discrete report point values to continuous deviation metrics. By calculating deviation across the entire binding curve and using this as the evaluation parameter, the system maintains simplicity while utilizing all available information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If complex model fitting calculations are performed to derive interaction parameters, then detailed kinetic information is obtained, but the computational complexity and time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetail of interaction parametersVSAvoidtime for calculations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential evaluation information directly from binding curve deviation without performing complex model fitting calculations. By taking out only the necessary deviation metrics rather than deriving full kinetic parameters through iterative fitting, the system reduces computational time while maintaining evaluation precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a more complete and reliable evaluation of analyte-ligand interactions by utilizing all data points, reducing computational complexity, and ensuring accurate results without requiring complex model fitting.

Implementation Method 1

A representative such biosensor system is the BIACOREĀ® instrumentation sold by GE Healthcare, which uses surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for detecting interactions between molecules in a sample and molecular structures immobilized on a sensing surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface plasmon resonance:

Data Source

PatentUS12366573B2Method and system for interaction analysis
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 CYTIVA SWEDEN AB
  • US12366573B2 patent drawing
  • US12366573B2 patent drawing
  • US12366573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for interaction analysis are disclosed. An example method for evaluation of an interaction between an analyte in a fluid sample and a ligand immobilized on a sensor surface of a biosensor includes providing a reference binding curve, representing a reference interaction for a predetermined acquisition cycle, by acquiring, using the biosensor, one or more binding curves for a reference-analyte ligand interaction at the predetermined acquisition conditions, acquiring, using the biosensor, a sample binding curve for the analyte ligand interaction for the predetermined acquisition cycle including at least one association phase wherein the sensor surface is put into contact with a fluid sample including analyte at a predetermined concentration, and generating a graphical user interface, including an upper threshold curve and a lower threshold curve defined with respect to the reference binding curve.