Model Selection Using Feature Health Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing model selection systems face challenges in choosing the top K performing subset of models from a model ensemble for prediction in domains with faulty and unreliable sensors, as they often rely on ensemble performance rather than identifying superior individual models.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a multi-stage approach that clusters health score vectors from sensors, compares model score distributions within clusters to the ensemble distribution, and selects the top K performing models for each cluster, thereby leveraging superior individual models instead of the ensemble.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If model ensemble is used for prediction, then system robustness is improved, but individual model performance is diluted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem robustnessVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model ensemble into individual models and evaluates each model's performance independently using health score vectors. By clustering models based on their health scores and feature importance, the system identifies top-performing individual models rather than relying on aggregated ensemble predictions, thus resolving the contradiction between robustness and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection parameter from ensemble-wide metrics to individual model health score vectors. By transforming the selection criterion to focus on models with higher health scores and better feature importance alignments, the system achieves both robustness through health-based filtering and precision through top-model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If all models in ensemble are deployed, then system complexity is reduced, but computational resources are wasted on poor performing models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes poor-performing models from the deployment set by evaluating each model's health score vector and feature importance. Only the top K performing models are selected for deployment, extracting the unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining deployment simplicity through automated selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of deploying all models in the ensemble (excessive action), the patent applies partial action by selecting only the top K models based on health scores. This partial deployment reduces computational resource consumption while maintaining sufficient prediction accuracy, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If feature health scores are collected continuously, then model selection accuracy is improved, but data transmission overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection accuracyVSAvoidtransmission energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by collecting and processing health score vectors locally at edge nodes before transmission to the central node. By accumulating and pre-processing this data at the edge, the system reduces the need for continuous transmission, thereby improving model selection accuracy while reducing transmission energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces edge nodes as intermediaries between sensor nodes and the central node. These intermediaries aggregate health score vectors and perform local processing, reducing the volume and frequency of transmissions to the central node. This intermediary layer maintains selection accuracy while significantly reducing transmission energy overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250045642A1Model selection using feature health scores with unreliable sensors
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250045642A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045642A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045642A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for model selection using feature health scores with unreliable sensors. One example method includes clustering health score vectors received from nodes operating in an environment, the health score vectors including feature health scores for sensors used by machine learning models; comparing a model score distribution for an ensemble of the models with model score distributions per cluster, to obtain a set of top K performing models for each cluster, upon receiving new data for prediction, identifying an associated health score vector for the data and using the top K performing models corresponding to the cluster for the associated health score vector to select the top K performing models; and deploying the clusters and model ensembles to the nodes.