No-Code/Full-Code Modernization Platform for Enterprise Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing enterprise software solutions are disjointed, inflexible, and static, leading to integration challenges and data compatibility issues, with in-house proprietary integration software being costly and lacking state-of-the-art audit, security, and reliability.

Innovation Solution

An application modernization engine utilizing simulated intelligence and expanded tooling for no-code and full-code operations, enabling seamless integration and augmentation of functionalities across multiple systems, providing omnichannel runtime processes and integrating with existing systems, including machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple disparate enterprise software solutions are used to achieve individual tasks, then task-specific functionality is improved, but system integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask-specific functionalityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an integration layer as an intermediary between disparate enterprise software solutions. This layer provides standardized interfaces and protocols that enable communication and data exchange between systems without requiring direct integration between each pair of systems, thereby reducing overall integration complexity while maintaining task-specific functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal integration framework that can handle multiple different enterprise software solutions through a common set of protocols and interfaces. This universal layer allows the system to accommodate various task-specific applications while providing unified access and integration mechanisms, reducing the need for separate integration solutions for each system pair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If static software implementations are used, then system stability is improved, but functionality to receive new features deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidfunctionality to receive new features
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic configuration capabilities that allow the software system to adapt its behavior and functionality without requiring changes to the core stable structure. The system can dynamically load new modules, adjust configurations, and modify interfaces while maintaining the stability of the underlying framework, thereby enabling new features without compromising system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the software system into modular segments or microservices that can be independently updated and deployed. This segmentation allows new functionality to be added as separate modules that can be integrated into the stable core system without affecting the overall stability, as each module can be tested and validated independently before integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If in-house proprietary integration software is used, then integration capability is improved, but development cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages open-source integration frameworks and standardized protocols as templates or copies that can be adapted to specific integration needs. By building upon existing open-source foundations rather than creating proprietary integration software from scratch, the system reduces development costs while maintaining full integration capability across multiple enterprise software solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses configuration parameters and settings to adapt standardized integration components to specific business needs rather than custom-developing integration solutions. By changing parameters such as data formats, communication protocols, and interface configurations, the system achieves tailored integration capabilities without the high development costs associated with proprietary custom software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of information

If APIs are used to connect applications, then data sharing capability is improved, but maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sharing capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated monitoring and feedback mechanisms that detect API issues, data inconsistencies, and integration problems. The system automatically generates alerts, logs errors, and provides feedback for maintenance activities, enabling proactive identification and resolution of issues. This automated feedback loop reduces manual maintenance requirements by continuously monitoring API health and data sharing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces self-service capabilities where the integration system automatically manages its own maintenance activities. The system can autonomously perform error logging, data validation, protocol updates, and conflict resolution without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach reduces maintenance time and effort while ensuring continuous data sharing capability across connected applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250306906A1Application development process through a modernization platform supporting no-code and full-code operations while enabling the augmentation of new functionality
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 FLOWX AI INC
  • US20250306906A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306906A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A. method of application modernization engine executed by processors. The application modernization engine provides improved application development through simulated intelligence and expanded tooling. The method includes determining, by the application modernization engine, a collection of resources to support a first functionality within an existing enterprise computer system and provide a set of outcomes. The method includes developing, by the application modernization engine, an application including the collection of resources with no-code and full-code operations. The method includes augmenting, by the application modernization engine, the application with a second functionality not present in the existing enterprise computer system. The method includes deploying, by the application modernization engine, the application into the existing enterprise computer system.