Mode S Transponder In-Service Performance Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring the performance of Mode S transponders on aircraft are limited, requiring removal and testing on a test bench, which causes downtime and lacks a simple, economically affordable means to detect malfunctions or performance degradations between maintenance periods, posing a risk to air traffic control security.

Innovation Solution

A method for testing the performance of Mode S transponders in-service on aircraft using a secondary radar to measure transmitted power, response rate, and sensitivity through operational and additional interrogations, allowing for continuous monitoring without modifying the radar's operational parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If transponder performance monitoring is performed using current methods requiring removal and test bench testing, then measurement precision can be ensured, but aircraft downtime increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransponder performance measurementVSAvoidaircraft operational availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The transponder monitors its own performance characteristics by analyzing its transmitted signals and received interrogations, enabling self-diagnostics without external test equipment. The system uses its operational signals to assess transmission power, response rate, and sensitivity metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system performs multiple functions using the same radar interrogation infrastructure: normal air traffic control surveillance, performance metric collection, and fault detection all occur through the same signal exchange mechanism, eliminating the need for separate test bench equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If transponder performance monitoring is performed using current methods requiring removal from aircraft, then reliable measurements can be obtained, but loss of time increases due to aircraft grounding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidaircraft maintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects performance data during normal operations, so that when a fault condition is detected or maintenance is scheduled, the assessment is already complete or near-complete, eliminating the need for time-consuming on-bench testing later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Performance monitoring occurs continuously during normal flight operations rather than being interrupted for separate testing. The same radar-transponder signal exchange that provides air traffic control information also provides performance measurement data without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of operation

If simple and economically affordable monitoring means are implemented, then ease of operation improves, but measurement precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system operationVSAvoidtransponder characteristic measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the transponder's own operational signals to measure its performance characteristics, requiring no external test equipment or complex monitoring infrastructure. The transponder essentially measures itself using the existing radar interrogation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system measures performance by analyzing the feedback signals already present in the radar-transponder dialogue. Transmission power is measured from the strength of returned signals, response rate from the timing of replies, and sensitivity from the weakest detectable interrogation signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables continuous monitoring of transponder performance, detecting malfunctions early, and ensuring compliance with ICAO standards without grounding aircraft, thereby enhancing air traffic control security and reducing downtime costs.

Implementation Method 1

a selective interrogation, on a frequency of 1030 MHz, intended specifically for the aircraft in question, via the Mode S address of the latter, the response of the transponder of the aircraft in question to this interrogation, on a frequency of 1090 MHz

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3570070B1Method for measuring the operational functioning of certain characteristics of an airborne transponder using secondary radar
Publication Date: 2021.11.10 THALES SA
  • EP3570070B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3570070B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3570070B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an operational testing method according to the invention, comprising three distinct steps: a first step (11) using the transponder's responses to Mode S interrogations transmitted in operational mode by the secondary radar to measure the transponder's power and the average response rate to Mode S interrogations transmitted by the radar to it; a second step (12) measuring the transponder's sensitivity; and a third step (13) testing its maximum response rate. The second and third steps are performed by modifying the radar's operating parameters so that the additional interrogations required for the measurement can be carried out during the time interval following the last operational interrogation, during which the aircraft remains located within the main Sum channel lobe of the radar antenna.