Modified Transposon End Sequences for Flexible NGS Library Preparation

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for DNA fragmentation in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) are limited by the need for expensive capital equipment in mechanical approaches, variable performance in enzymatic strategies, and limitations on library adapter structure in tagmentation-based methods, particularly due to the requirement for a defined 19-bp mosaic end sequence adjacent to library inserts.

Innovation Solution

The use of modified transposon end sequences with mutations such as uracil, inosine, ribose, 8-oxoguanine, thymine glycol, modified purines, and modified pyrimidines allows for decoupling of enzymatic fragmentation and adapter tagging steps, enabling hybrid Tn5-ligation library preparation approaches that eliminate the constraint of the 19-bp mosaic end sequence requirement, facilitating the incorporation of features like forked adapters and unique molecular identifiers while maintaining compatibility with standard sequencing methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If tagmentation-based approaches are used for DNA fragmentation, then enzymatic fragmentation is achieved without specialized equipment, but library adapter structure is limited due to the requirement for a defined 19-bp mosaic end sequence adjacent to library inserts

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the mosaic end sequence requirement from the library preparation process by using fragmentase enzymes that generate fragments without requiring the 19-bp mosaic end sequence. This separates the fragmentation function from the adapter tagging function, allowing independent optimization of each step and enabling greater adapter structure flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the library preparation workflow into distinct enzymatic steps: fragmentation by fragmentase, end repair, and adapter ligation. This segmentation allows each step to be independently optimized and performed with different enzymes, removing the constraint that coupled tagmentation imposed on adapter structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If transposase-mediated fragmentation is used, then adapter sequences are introduced during fragmentation, but the process is limited to one turnover and requires introduction of the mosaic end sequence into DNA fragments

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fragmentase enzymes that act once on the DNA substrate and are then discarded, rather than using transposases that require complex preloading with transposon substrates and are limited to one turnover. This simplifies the reaction system while maintaining high fragmentation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If fragmentase enzymes are used for enzymatic fragmentation, then no specialized equipment is required, but the enzymes can turn-over several times making fragmentation time- and concentration-dependent requiring optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of fragmentase enzyme concentration and reaction time to achieve the desired fragment size distribution before proceeding with library preparation. This preliminary action establishes a standardized protocol that reduces the need for further optimization by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the flexibility and efficiency of library preparation by allowing the inclusion of additional features in NGS libraries without the need for specialized equipment, improving fragment size distribution and sequencing performance, and enabling PCR-free and UMI library preparation workflows.

Implementation Method 1

transposition by bead-linked transposomes (BLTs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

combining the sample with an endonuclease or an enzyme mixture and cleaving the modified mosaic end sequence at the uracil, inosine, ribose, 8-oxoguanine, thymine glycol, modified purine, and/or modified pyrimidine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic cleavage at modified bases: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS20240175010A1Methods of Library Preparation
Publication Date: 2024.05.30
  • US20240175010A1 patent drawing
  • US20240175010A1 patent drawing
  • US20240175010A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a modified transposon end sequence comprising a mosaic end sequence, wherein the mosaic end sequence comprises one or more mutation as compared to a wild-type mosaic end sequence, wherein the mutation comprises a substitution with a uracil, an inosine, a ribose, an 8-oxoguanine, a thymine glycol, a modified purine, or a modified pyrimidine. Also disclosed are transposome complexes comprising these modified transposon end sequences and methods of library preparation using these modified transposon end sequences.