Modular Aerial Vehicle Assembly for In-Field Mission Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerial vehicles face challenges due to rapidly changing mission and payload requirements, lengthy development cycles, and technological advancements that render designs obsolete, leading to high costs and inflexibility.

Innovation Solution

A mission-adaptable aerial vehicle system with modular, reversibly attachable components and a data processing system that allows for in-field assembly and customization, using a user interface and simulation to adjust flight dynamics and stability in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aerial vehicle design is customized for specific mission requirements, then performance is optimized, but development time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission performanceVSAvoiddevelopment cycle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The aerial vehicle is divided into modular components (fuselage sections, wing assemblies, tail assemblies, propulsion units) that can be independently designed, manufactured, and reconfigured. This segmentation allows different mission configurations to be created by assembling pre-developed modules, dramatically reducing development time while maintaining mission-optimized performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design incorporates reversible attachment mechanisms that enable dynamic reconfiguration of vehicle components in the field. Mission requirements can be changed without lengthy re-development processes, allowing the system to adapt dynamically to new missions while maintaining optimized performance for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If aerial vehicle design is customized for specific mission requirements, then performance is optimized, but development cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission performanceVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single set of modular components can be reconfigured to serve multiple mission types. The universal module design means that one fuselage section, wing assembly, or propulsion unit can be used across different mission configurations, spreading development costs across multiple applications and reducing the cost per mission-optimized vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Components that have completed their function in one mission configuration can be recovered and reused in another mission configuration. This recovery and reuse of expensive components significantly reduces the effective development and acquisition cost for each new mission while maintaining optimized performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If aerial vehicle components are fixed in design, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to changing missions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmission adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the vehicle into standardized modular components with reversible attachments, the design achieves both manufacturing simplicity (each module can be manufactured independently using standard processes) and mission adaptability (modules can be reconfigured for different missions in the field).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reversible attachment system enables dynamic reconfiguration of fixed manufactured components. The components themselves remain fixed in design for manufacturing simplicity, but their arrangement and configuration are dynamic, allowing adaptability to changing mission requirements without complicating the manufacturing of individual parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Strength

If traditional aerial vehicle assembly is used, then structural integrity is ensured, but in-field assembly capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidin-field assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Attachment features and alignment mechanisms are built into the components during manufacturing (preliminary action). This pre-integrated guidance and coupling infrastructure enables field operators to assemble the vehicle without specialized tools or facilities, maintaining structural integrity while enabling in-field assembly capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reversible attachment system is designed to be self-aligning and self-securing through integrated features on the components themselves. This self-service capability allows field assembly without requiring external specialized equipment or complex procedures, maintaining strength while enabling operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260035109A1Mission-adaptable aerial vehicle and methods for in-field assembly and use
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 FIRESTORM LABS INC
  • US20260035109A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035109A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035109A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for mission-adaptable aerial vehicle. In some aspects, a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle includes a configuration having swappable, manipulatable, and interchangeable sections and components connectable by a connection and fastening system able to be modified by an end-user in the field. In some embodiments, a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle can be configured to include a main center body extending along a longitudinal direction, a wing with a lateral cross-sectional airfoil shape, and/or stabilizer and control surface structures with corresponding cross-sectional airfoil shapes.