Modular Agricultural Implement for Sensor-Guided Crop-Row Weeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural systems lack precision and flexibility in automated weeding operations, particularly in varying field conditions and crop arrangements, leading to inefficiencies and the need for manual labor.

Innovation Solution

A modular and reconfigurable agricultural implement with adjustable components, including a frame, modular assemblies, and sensors, that autonomously adjusts to field conditions and crop arrangements for precise weeding and data collection, using actuators and controllers to align with crop rows for accurate operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing agricultural systems use fixed, non-modular structures for weeding operations, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to varying field conditions and crop arrangements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying field conditions and crop arrangementsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The weeding system is divided into multiple independent modular assemblies that can be selectively configured. Each modular assembly contains its own actuator, sensor, and effector components, allowing the system to be segmented into functional units that can be independently adjusted for different crop types and field conditions without redesigning the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that can dynamically adapt to varying field conditions. The modular assemblies can be repositioned, adjusted, or reconfigured based on real-time sensor data and operational requirements, enabling the system to respond to changing agricultural conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If automated weeding systems lack precision in alignment with crop rows, then the ease of operation is improved, but the manufacturing precision and weeding accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision in alignment with crop rowsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that detect crop row positions and provide feedback to the control system. This feedback enables automatic adjustment of the modular assemblies to achieve precise alignment with crop rows, eliminating the need for manual calibration while maintaining high precision through automated control loops that continuously monitor and correct positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual alignment procedures are replaced with automated sensing and control systems. Instead of requiring mechanical adjustment mechanisms for precise positioning, the system uses sensors to detect crop locations and electronically controls the actuators to achieve and maintain precise alignment, reducing mechanical complexity while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If the system uses fixed configurations for weeding operations, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the productivity and operational efficiency in varying conditions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiency in varying field conditionsVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The modular assemblies are designed with universal interfaces and standardized components that can be used across different agricultural operations and field conditions. This universality allows the same basic modular unit to perform multiple functions (different weeding techniques, sensor configurations, actuator types) while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized production processes and supply chains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables parameter changes in operational parameters such as weeding depth, blade angle, sensor sensitivity, and actuator speed without requiring manufacturing changes. These parameters can be adjusted through software control and mechanical adjustments within the modular assemblies, allowing high productivity across varying conditions while maintaining consistent manufacturing processes for the standardized modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250261626A1Automated agriculture implement
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 FARMWISE LABS INC
  • US20250261626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The system can include: an implement frame and a set of modular assemblies. The system can optionally include a vehicle and a set of effectors. However, the system can additionally or alternatively include any other suitable set of components. The system can function to facilitate automated and/or perception-based weeding and/or other automated agricultural operations. Additionally, the system can function to collect plant-level data on crops during implement operation. However, the system can additionally or alternatively be configured to provide any other suitable functionality.