Modular air handling systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air handling systems face challenges in efficiently managing airflow demands without significant increases in power consumption or acoustic noise, particularly when varying airflow requirements necessitate changes in fan configurations.

Innovation Solution

Modular air handling systems with independently controlled low velocity axial fans, sensors, and a centralized control system that allow for flexible configurations of fans in series or parallel, enabling closed-loop control and redundancy to maintain system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fan speed is increased to meet airflow demand, then airflow is improved, but power consumption increases by the cube of the speed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveairflowVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the fan assembly into multiple independent fan modules (first fan module, second fan module, etc.), each capable of operating independently. This segmentation allows the system to meet airflow demands by activating multiple lower-power fans rather than overloading a single high-speed fan, thereby avoiding the cubic power increase associated with high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the operational state of individual fan modules based on real-time airflow demands. Fans can be selectively activated or deactivated, and their speeds can be independently controlled, allowing the system to optimize power consumption by matching fan output precisely to demand rather than operating at constant high speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If fan speed is increased to meet airflow demand, then airflow is improved, but acoustic noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveairflowVSAvoidacoustic noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the fan system into multiple independent modules, the design enables multiple fans to operate at lower speeds rather than a single fan operating at high speed. Since acoustic noise increases with fan speed, this segmentation strategy reduces overall noise levels while maintaining the required airflow capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple low-speed fan modules to achieve the same airflow output that would require a single high-speed fan. This merging approach leverages the fact that multiple fans operating in parallel at lower speeds generate less acoustic noise than one fan operating at high speed, thus resolving the noise-airflow trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If single fan configuration is used, then device complexity is reduced, but system reliability decreases when high airflow or pressure is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefan configurationVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple independent fan modules, each with its own control capabilities. This segmentation provides redundancy and flexibility: if one fan module fails or requires maintenance, others can continue operating, and the control system can dynamically adjust to maintain required airflow or pressure levels, thereby enhancing reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system can change operational parameters (such as the number of active fans and their individual speeds) to adapt to varying airflow and pressure demands. This parameter flexibility allows the system to maintain reliable performance across different operating conditions while keeping the physical configuration relatively simple and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If multiple fans are operated in parallel, then maximum airflow is increased, but maximum pressure remains unchanged

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveairflowVSAvoidmaximum pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the operational configuration of fan modules based on real-time system demands. When high airflow is required, fans operate in parallel mode. When high pressure is needed, the control system can reconfigure fans to operate in series or adjust individual fan speeds to optimize pressure generation, providing adaptive response to varying operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system can change the operational parameters of fan modules, including their configuration (parallel or series) and rotational speeds, to match demand conditions. This parameter flexibility allows the system to optimize for either airflow or pressure as needed, rather than being locked into a fixed configuration that excels at only one parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently manages airflow demands with reduced power consumption and acoustic noise, allowing for seamless operation even when individual components fail, through independent fan control and modular design.

Implementation Method 1

at least one low velocity axial fan

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFan: Fan

Implementation Method 2

an isolation damper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamper: Valve

Implementation Method 3

a number of sensors for receiving process data, discharge data, and environmental data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensing:

Implementation Method 4

a control system for processing data from the number of sensors to provide a closed loop control of the modular air handling system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectClosed loop control: Feedback

Implementation Method 5

the head portion is manufactured from an acoustical energy absorbing material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustical energy absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 6

a number of inlet airflow guides for providing acoustic attenuation and flow straightening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic attenuation: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentUS12443158B2Modular air handling systems
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 SHAMSHOIAN GARY PETER
  • US12443158B2 patent drawing
  • US12443158B2 patent drawing
  • US12443158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Modular air handling systems are presented including: at least one blade, where the at least one blade includes: an intake section for receiving an airflow including: an intake air portion, a filter portion, a coil portion, and a head portion; a removable fan module, where the removable fan module includes: at least one low velocity axial fan; and an isolation damper; a discharge section for discharging the airflow including: a discharge air portion; and a number of sensors for receiving process data, discharge data, and environmental data; and a control system for processing data from the number of sensors to provide a closed loop control of the modular air handling system, where each blade operates independently, and where the at least one low velocity axial fan for each removable fan module are controlled by a single control signal.