Modular Air Suspension Manifold With Integrated Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronically controlled air suspension systems are complex, expensive, and lack reconfigurability, making them difficult to manufacture and integrate into various vehicle configurations, with challenges in reducing the number of operations for internal component coupling and achieving low per-unit costs for robust electronic control units.

Innovation Solution

A modular electronically controlled air suspension system with a manifold, actuator, pressure sensor, and electronics module that allows for flexible reconfiguration, reduced part count, and single-operation coupling of components, utilizing injection-moldable materials and simplified assembly to decrease complexity and cost, while enabling efficient control of air flow to air springs and dampers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional electronically controlled air suspension systems are used, then reliable suspension control is achieved, but system complexity and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple control functions (electronic control unit, manifolds, valves, sensors) into an integrated assembly where the electronic control unit directly interfaces with control valves through simplified coupling mechanisms, reducing the number of discrete components and interconnections while maintaining control reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control unit is designed with a standardized interface that can control multiple air springs and dampers across different vehicle configurations, allowing a single design to serve multiple functions and applications without requiring complex reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional electronically controlled air suspension systems are used, then suspension control is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases due to extensive machining and assembly operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension control reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the electronic control unit with manifold assemblies in a way that reduces the number of separate machining operations and assembly steps, combining functions that were previously requiring multiple discrete manufacturing processes into unified components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into modular components (electronic control unit, manifolds, valves, sensors) that can be manufactured separately using optimized processes and then assembled through simplified coupling mechanisms, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If conventional electronically controlled air suspension systems are used, then active suspension control is achieved, but reconfigurability for different vehicle configurations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension control reliabilityVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control unit employs a standardized universal interface design that can accommodate different vehicle configurations and suspension arrangements, allowing the same control unit to be reconfigured for various applications without requiring specialized designs for each configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If robust electronic control units with complex manifolds are manufactured, then reliable control is achieved, but per-unit manufacturing cost decreases are difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol unit reliabilityVSAvoidper-unit manufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the electronic control unit with manifold functions in an integrated assembly, eliminating the need for separate complex manifold manufacturing and reducing the total number of parts that require individual manufacturing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into modular functional units that can be manufactured using cost-effective processes and then assembled through simplified coupling, reducing the overall per-unit manufacturing cost while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Productivity

If the number of operations for internally coupling electronic control unit components is reduced, then manufacturing efficiency increases, but integration of sub-system components becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates sub-system components (electronic control unit, manifolds, valves, sensors) into a unified assembly with standardized interfaces, allowing multiple components to be coupled through simplified operations while maintaining proper integration and functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11571941B2Electronically controlled vehicle suspension system and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 AKTV8 LLC
  • US11571941B2 patent drawing
  • US11571941B2 patent drawing
  • US11571941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air suspension system, comprising a manifold, defining a first and second port, each port defining a receiving region at the second end, wherein the first and second ports are arranged in a common plane, a channel intersecting the first and second port, a cavity intersecting each port, and a pressure sensor port, positioned between the first and second port, defining a sensor insertion axis normal to the common plane, the pressure sensor port separated from the first port, the second port, and the channel by a thickness; a first and second solenoid valve, each solenoid valve arranged within the cavity and coaxially arranged with the first and second ports, each solenoid valve comprising a connector; a pressure sensor arranged within the pressure sensor port, the pressure sensor comprising a connector; and an electronics module arranged parallel the common plane, the electronics module configured to electrically couple to the connectors.