Modular Aircraft Mission Pod Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mission-specific pods for aircraft face limitations in flexibility, adaptability, and accessibility due to standardized interfaces, which restrict their size, shape, and modularity, requiring complete removal for testing, maintenance, and mission changes, leading to complex and costly processes.

Innovation Solution

A modular mission pod system with a fixed portion securely attached to the aircraft and a removable modular portion that includes all mission-specific components, allowing for easy interchange of different mission pods without needing to detach the fixed portion, featuring a component cooling system and data communication interfaces for efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional pods use standardized mechanical and electrical interfaces with the aircraft, then ease of integration is improved, but pod size, shape, and modularity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of integrationVSAvoidpod size and shape flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The pod system is divided into a fixed portion (base pod) that remains attached to the aircraft and a removable modular portion containing mission-specific components. This segmentation allows the modular portion to be easily detached and replaced while the fixed portion maintains standardized interfaces with the aircraft, resolving the contradiction between ease of integration and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If customized pod interfaces are used to accommodate larger pods with wider variety of mission systems, then flexibility and utility are improved, but installation complexity and aircraft modification costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission system varietyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the pod into fixed and removable modular portions, the system accommodates diverse mission systems in the modular portion without requiring customization of the aircraft interface. The fixed portion maintains standardized interfaces, while the modular portion can be customized for different missions, reducing installation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed base pod serves as a universal platform that can support multiple different modular portions for various missions. This multi-functionality allows the aircraft to accommodate wider variety of mission systems through standardized interfaces, reducing the need for customized aircraft modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of repair

If complete pod removal is required for testing, maintenance, or troubleshooting, then component accessibility is improved, but maintenance time and operational downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent accessibilityVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pod is segmented into fixed and removable modular portions. The removable portion can be quickly detached from the aircraft for testing, maintenance, or troubleshooting without removing the entire pod assembly. This reduces maintenance downtime while maintaining component accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The removable modular portion containing mission-specific components can be extracted from the fixed base pod for separate testing and maintenance. This allows components to be accessed and serviced without completely removing the pod from the aircraft, reducing operational downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If lateral or longitudinal movement of component panels is used for access, then component accessibility is improved, but movement is obstructed by aircraft structures such as landing gear and fairings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent accessibilityVSAvoidstructural obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pod is divided into fixed and removable portions, allowing the removable portion to be accessed by simple detachment rather than lateral or longitudinal movement. This avoids obstruction by aircraft structures while maintaining component accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2818416B1Modular pod system for aircraft
Publication Date: 2016.09.07 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2818416B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2818416B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2818416B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A mission pod system for an aircraft set to perform a mission includes a fixed portion (32) that is fixedly secured to an exterior surface of the aircraft. The mission pod system also includes a modular portion (34) that is removably secured to the fixed portion and spaced away from the exterior surface of the aircraft via the fixed portion. The modular portion includes an entirety of mission-specific components (36, 38, 50).