Modular Aircraft Wing and Engine Interchangeability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft designs are optimized for specific missions, requiring different configurations for varying roles, leading to the need for multiple aircraft types, and existing modular solutions lack interchangeable wing and engine modules for adaptability.

Innovation Solution

A modular aircraft system with a single fuselage and interchangeable wing and engine configurations, including three wing types and three engine modules, optimized for different missions, using mechanical, electromechanical, and magnetic locking attachments for easy replacement, along with a flight management system for automated adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aircraft are designed with fixed configurations optimized for specific missions, then mission performance is improved, but adaptability to different missions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission performanceVSAvoidadaptability to different missions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into modular components including interchangeable wings, fuselage sections, and engine modules. Each module can be independently designed, manufactured, and replaced to optimize for different mission requirements while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft employs universal attachment mechanisms and standardized interfaces that allow the same basic airframe to accommodate multiple wing configurations and engine types, enabling a single platform to perform multiple mission roles effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple aircraft types are purchased to fulfill different mission roles, then mission-specific performance is improved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission-specific performanceVSAvoidnumber of aircraft types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single aircraft platform with universal attachment systems can be configured with different wings and engines to fulfill multiple mission roles, eliminating the need to operate and maintain multiple distinct aircraft types while maintaining mission-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft configuration is made dynamic through the ability to quickly interchange modules in the field, allowing the same airframe to transition between different mission configurations as operational needs change, reducing fleet complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If wings are permanently attached to aircraft for structural integrity, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability and ease of replacement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidease of wing replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wing attachment system is segmented into modular connection points with standardized interfaces that maintain structural integrity when connected while enabling quick detachment and replacement of entire wing modules without compromising airframe strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional permanent mechanical fastening systems are replaced with advanced attachment mechanisms such as magnetic locks, hydraulic latches, or shape memory alloy connectors that provide bond strengths comparable to permanent attachments while allowing controlled, tool-free or minimal-tool removal for rapid wing exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If aircraft configurations are optimized for specific missions, then operational efficiency for that mission is improved, but downtime for reconfiguration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple wing and engine modules are pre-configured and pre-tested for specific mission types, allowing operators to select and install the appropriate configuration module in advance or quickly swap between pre-prepared modules, minimizing reconfiguration time while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft system transitions from static, fixed configurations to dynamic, rapidly reconfigurable systems using quick-connect mechanisms and modular designs that enable field changes without extensive maintenance or specialized tooling, reducing downtime between mission types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a single aircraft to perform multiple roles with reduced downtime and costs, as damaged modules can be quickly replaced, and the system can be adapted for various missions with minimal training and maintenance, enhancing operational flexibility and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

using mechanical, electromechanical, and magnetic locking attachments for easy replacement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic locking: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS9505484B1Modular aircraft system
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 AL SABAH NASSER M
  • US9505484B1 patent drawing
  • US9505484B1 patent drawing
  • US9505484B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The modular aircraft system includes a single fuselage having a permanently installed empennage and plural sets of wing modules and engine modules, with each wing and engine module optimized for different flight conditions and missions. The fuselage and each of the modules are configured for rapid removal and installation of the modules to minimize downtime for the aircraft. Short wings having relatively low aspect ratio are provided for relatively high speed flight when great endurance and/or weight carrying capacity are not of great concern. Long wings having high aspect ratio are provided for longer range and endurance flights where speed is not absolutely vital. A medium span wing module is also provided. Turboprop, single turbojet, and dual turbojet engine modules are provided for installation depending upon mission requirements for any given flight. The aircraft is primarily adapted for use as an autonomously operated or remotely operated unmanned aerial vehicle.