Modular Physiological Training System with Sensor-Ready Anatomy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional simulated physiological structures lack anatomical fidelity and modularity, failing to provide realistic training experiences for medical procedures, which can lead to negative training and potential complications in real-world scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A modular, sensor-ready anatomically accurate physiological training system with interchangeable components that replicate human anatomy, including airway assemblies and torso structures, utilizing silicone materials and conformable carbon nanotube sensors to enhance realism and provide objective performance evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional simulated physiological structures are constructed from durable plastics and rubbers, then durability and ease of manufacturing are improved, but anatomical fidelity and realism deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidanatomical fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining silicone rubber (for anatomical realism) with internal plastic skeletons and support structures (for durability). The silicone materials replicate human tissue properties while the internal framework provides structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between realism and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The simulated physiological structure is divided into modular segments (head, torso, limbs, organs) that can be independently manufactured with high anatomical fidelity using silicone, while connection points and internal frameworks use durable plastics. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional simulated physiological structures are designed as single-unit systems, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability for different training scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtraining scenario adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into modular components (different organ systems, anatomical regions, pathological conditions) that can be independently manufactured and then assembled in various combinations. This allows a single manufacturing process to produce multiple training scenarios by reconfiguring the modular elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular components are designed with universal connection interfaces and standardized mounting mechanisms, allowing the same basic components to serve multiple training purposes. For example, the same torso module can be configured for different surgical procedures or trauma scenarios by changing the internal organ arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If conventional simulated physiological structures lack tactile realism, then ease of operation is improved, but training effectiveness deteriorates due to negative training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling simplicityVSAvoidtraining effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the simulation materials to match human tissue properties, including viscosity, elasticity, temperature, and texture. The silicone materials are formulated to replicate the tactile feedback of real human organs, providing realistic resistance and compliance during medical procedures while maintaining ease of manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If conventional simulated physiological structures do not include sensor integration, then device complexity is reduced, but objective performance evaluation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidperformance evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective visual assessment with objective sensor-based measurement systems. Force sensors, pressure sensors, and displacement sensors are integrated into the simulated structures to automatically detect and quantify student performance metrics, replacing the need for complex manual evaluation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers superior training by replicating human anatomy's physical appearance, tissue properties, and biomechanics, reducing the risk of negative training and improving medical professionals' skills through enhanced realism and objective performance assessment.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing silicone materials and conformable carbon nanotube sensors to enhance realism and provide objective performance evaluation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductivity: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS12444321B2Physiological training system
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 7 SIGMA
  • US12444321B2 patent drawing
  • US12444321B2 patent drawing
  • US12444321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular physiological training system including a torso, a rear skull portion, an airway assembly, and a front skull portion. The torso assembly representing a portion of a torso of a patient. The rear skull portion operably coupled to the torso assembly, and representing a rear portion of a patient's skull. The airway assembly representing an airway of the patient. The front skull portion including one or more coupling mechanisms, and representing a front portion of the patient's skull. The torso assembly and the rear skull portion configured to receive a portion of the airway assembly. The one or more coupling mechanisms of the front skull portion configured to operably couple the front skull portion to the airway assembly, and a front skull portion to the rear skull portion.