Modular Artificial Reef With Permeable Top

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial reefs face issues such as sinking, burying, and dragging due to soft sediment, lack of bacterial fauna assimilation, inadequate separation of coral habitat from sediment, insufficient surface area for coral growth, and limited habitat diversity.

Innovation Solution

The development of modular artificial reef articles comprising a top with enhanced water permeability, support members connected to the top, and an optional base, designed to distribute weight, reduce hydrodynamic drag, and provide diverse habitats for coral and fish.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If artificial reefs are deployed on soft sediment, then they provide habitat for marine organisms, but they sink into the sediment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of artificial reefVSAvoidsinking force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial reef is divided into multiple modular units that can be deployed independently. Each unit has its own base and support structure, allowing them to function as individual stable entities while forming a collective reef system. This segmentation enables easier deployment and reduces the overall sinking force on any single unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The artificial reef structure incorporates porous materials that allow water permeability while maintaining structural integrity. The porous design reduces the effective weight of the structure by allowing water to pass through, thereby reducing the sinking force while still providing adequate habitat surfaces for marine organisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Reliability

If artificial reefs are placed on soft bottom, then they establish habitat, but they get covered by sediment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of artificial reefVSAvoidsediment burial
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial reef units are pre-assembled with bases designed to resist sediment accumulation before deployment. The base structures include features such as protrusions or anchor points that are prepared in advance to prevent sediment from completely covering the structure, ensuring long-term visibility and functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The design parameters of the base structure are optimized to change the interaction between the artificial reef and soft sediment. By adjusting parameters such as base surface area, shape, and material properties, the structure achieves better resistance against sediment burial while maintaining stability on the soft bottom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If strong currents act on artificial reefs, then they experience water flow for habitat, but they are dragged from deployment site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition stabilityVSAvoiddrag force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial reef is segmented into modular units with individual anchor systems. This allows each unit to independently resist drag forces from strong currents while maintaining its deployed position. The segmented design enables better distribution of hydrodynamic loads across multiple anchor points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base structures are designed with local quality variations, including areas of different material densities and anchor configurations tailored to specific current conditions. This allows optimal resistance to drag forces at critical locations while maintaining overall habitat functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Area of stationary object

If artificial reefs use large structures, then they provide extensive habitat, but deployment becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehabitat surface areaVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The large habitat structure is divided into multiple smaller modular units that can be easily transported and deployed. Each module maintains the essential habitat features while being small enough for simplified deployment operations. The modules can be assembled on-site to form the complete large-scale reef system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular units are designed with universal interfaces and standardized components that can be assembled in various configurations. This multi-functionality allows the same basic module to serve different habitat purposes while simplifying deployment through standardized procedures and equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Device complexity

If artificial reefs have single habitat type, then they simplify design, but they lack biodiversity support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoidhabitat diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial reef system is segmented into different modular units, each designed to provide specific habitat types such as coral attachment surfaces, fish shelter cavities, and sediment-trapping structures. This segmentation allows diverse habitats to be distributed across multiple simple modules rather than requiring one complex monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular units are designed with universal characteristics that allow them to fulfill multiple ecological functions. Each module can support different species assemblages while maintaining a relatively simple design, achieving habitat diversity through the combination of standardized multi-functional units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12213462B2Mushroom forest artificial reef
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 QATAR UNIVERSITY
  • US12213462B2 patent drawing
  • US12213462B2 patent drawing
  • US12213462B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention are directed to articles used as an artificial reef and/or used as a part of an artificial reef, methods of making the articles, methods of using the articles, and methods of forming artificial reefs. The articles include a top, at least one support member, and optionally, a base. In some embodiments, the water permeability of the top of the article is greater (and in some embodiments, at least 10% greater) than the water permeability of the support, the water permeability of the optional base, or both. In preferred embodiments, the top, support(s), and optional base are formed of concrete.