Modular artist studio easel system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional easels are inflexible and often too large or too small for various canvas sizes, lacking support for the edges of the canvas, which can lead to instability when leaned against a wall or hung from the ceiling.

Innovation Solution

A modular artist studio easel system with adjustable mast members, support arms, cross members, and edge supports that can be configured to accommodate different canvas sizes and orientations, allowing for expansion and customization to support canvases from 6" by 8" up to 120" in height and infinite width.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a stationary rack is constructed to fit a particular canvas size, then the canvas is supported stably, but the rack becomes immobile and inflexible for other canvas sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecanvas support stabilityVSAvoidcanvas size flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The easel is divided into separate modular components including base members, mast members, support arms, and cross members that can be independently adjusted and reconfigured. This segmentation allows the same components to serve multiple canvas sizes by changing their relative positions and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The easel incorporates adjustable and movable components rather than fixed structures. Mast members can be repositioned vertically, support arms can be adjusted in length and angle, and cross members can be moved horizontally, enabling the structure to dynamically adapt to different canvas dimensions while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the canvas is leaned against a wall, then the easel structure is simplified, but the canvas edge slides on the floor and comes out of adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeasel structure simplicityVSAvoidcanvas position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support system is segmented into multiple contact points including floor supports, edge supports, and central mast support. This distributes the canvas weight and provides stabilization at multiple locations, preventing the canvas from sliding while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Edge supports act as intermediary elements between the canvas and the easel structure. These supports contact the canvas edges and transfer forces to the main structure, preventing direct contact between the canvas and floor that would cause sliding, while adding minimal structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the canvas is hung from the ceiling, then the easel structure is simplified, but the canvas hangs precariously balanced without support on ends or edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeasel structure simplicityVSAvoidcanvas balance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support system uses multiple segmented support points including floor supports at the base, edge supports along the canvas perimeter, and central support from the mast. This distributes the load and provides stability at multiple locations rather than relying on a single ceiling attachment point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Floor supports provide counterbalancing forces at the base of the easel structure that counteract the canvas weight and prevent precarious balancing. The distributed support system creates multiple counterbalancing moments that stabilize the canvas without requiring ceiling attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Device complexity

If conventional easels are used, then the structure is simple, but they are too large or too small for various canvas sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeasel structure simplicityVSAvoidcanvas size accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The easel components are designed with universal functionality to accommodate multiple canvas sizes. The same base members, mast members, support arms, and cross members can be reconfigured to support various canvas dimensions from small to large formats, eliminating the need for multiple specialized easels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The easel employs dynamic, adjustable components rather than fixed dimensions. Mast members can be repositioned, support arms adjusted in length and angle, and cross members moved to accommodate different canvas sizes, maintaining structural simplicity while achieving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11490731B2Modular artist studio easel system
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 NORMAN REGINALD
  • US11490731B2 patent drawing
  • US11490731B2 patent drawing
  • US11490731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example modular artist studio easel system includes a first mast member pivotally attached to first base member, and a second mast member pivotally attached to a second base member. Support arms are attached between the base members and the mast members. Cross members are slidably connected between the first mast member and the second mast member to adjust a width between the first mast member and the second mast member. A first back support is mounted to the first mast member, and a second back support is mounted to the second mast member, for supporting at least one canvas thereon. A first upper edge support and a first lower edge are mounted on the second back support. A second upper edge support and a second lower edge are mounted on the second back support.