Modular ATV Steering and Suspension for Variable Terrain Widths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ATVs face challenges in accommodating varying terrain conditions and passenger comfort due to fixed frame and suspension designs, limiting versatility and ergonomic adjustments.

Innovation Solution

The ATV features interchangeable front and rear suspensions, adjustable steering systems, and a modular frame design allowing for 48" and 55" widths, with components like power steering units and rack-and-pinion systems to enhance maneuverability and ergonomics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed frame and suspension design is used, then the structural simplicity is maintained, but the adaptability to varying terrain conditions and passenger comfort is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to terrain conditionsVSAvoidframe and suspension design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system is divided into multiple independent components including front suspension assemblies, rear suspension assemblies, and interchangeable suspension kits. Each suspension component can be independently selected and adjusted based on terrain requirements, allowing the vehicle to adapt to different conditions without redesigning the entire frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system incorporates adjustable elements such as variable spring rates, adjustable shock absorbers, and interchangeable suspension components that allow dynamic adjustment of suspension characteristics. This enables the vehicle to optimize its performance for different terrain conditions and loading scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If interchangeable suspensions and modular frame design are implemented, then the adaptability across different terrains is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility for different terrainsVSAvoidmodular components and assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame design incorporates universal mounting points and standardized interfaces that allow multiple suspension configurations to be used with a single frame. The power train components are designed to accommodate different suspension geometries, enabling one frame to support multiple terrain-specific suspension setups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The modular suspension system allows change of key parameters such as suspension travel, spring rates, and geometry through interchangeable components. By changing suspension kits with different parameter specifications, the vehicle can be optimized for various terrains without modifying the fundamental frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If adjustable steering systems are used, then the maneuverability and ergonomics are enhanced, but the steering system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuverability and ergonomicsVSAvoidsteering system components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system incorporates adjustable elements including variable steering ratios, adjustable steering column position, and configurable steering geometry. These dynamic adjustments allow optimization of steering characteristics for different operating conditions and rider preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The power steering unit acts as an intermediary between the rider's steering input and the front wheel orientation. It provides assistive torque and can be adjusted to provide different levels of power assistance, making the steering system easier to operate across various terrain conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the frame width is made adjustable for 48" and 55" configurations, then the versatility is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe width configurationsVSAvoidmanufacturing multiple width configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is constructed from modular sections with standardized connection points that allow reconfiguration between different width settings. The frame components can be segmented and reassembled in different configurations, enabling production of multiple width variants from the same basic frame set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame width parameter can be changed by selecting different frame rail lengths or adjusting the position of frame components. This allows the same frame design to produce both 48-inch and 55-inch width configurations through parameter variation rather than complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12409882B2All-terrain vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 POLARIS IND INC
  • US12409882B2 patent drawing
  • US12409882B2 patent drawing
  • US12409882B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ATV is shown having a steering system comprised of a power steering unit having drive and driven pitman arms coupled to a drag link. The drive pitman arm is laterally offset from a vehicle centerline and is driven by the power steering unit. An alternate power steering system includes a pack and pinion subassembly coupled to a power steering motor, which then couples to steering arms of the ATV.