Modular Audio Control Surface with Segmented Grid Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio control surfaces are inflexible and costly, requiring users to either under-specify or over-specify their equipment as their needs change, leading to inefficient resource allocation and the need for frequent system upgrades or replacements.

Innovation Solution

A modular audio control surface system that allows users to configure a customizable control surface with standardized modules arranged in a two-dimensional grid, enabling scalable and adaptable control with interchangeable modules and network connectivity for external media applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a control surface is designed with fixed, non-modular architecture, then manufacturing and operational simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing user requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing user requirementsVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control surface is divided into multiple independent modules (channel modules, console modules, effects modules, etc.) that can be selectively combined. Each module handles specific audio processing functions, allowing the system to be segmented according to user needs and reconfigured as requirements change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized module interface and framework enable a single module design to serve multiple functions and be used across different control surface configurations. Modules can be universally applied to various channel counts and processing requirements through the standardized connection framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a control surface is designed to meet maximum possible requirements, then future-proof capability is achieved, but initial cost and resource allocation efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuture-proof capabilityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Users can select and combine only the specific modules needed for their current requirements rather than purchasing a complete high-capacity system. The segmented architecture allows incremental addition of modules as needs evolve, optimizing resource allocation at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control surface configuration is dynamic rather than static. Users can add, remove, or reconfigure modules based on changing audio production requirements, allowing the system to adapt its capacity to match actual usage patterns over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a control surface is designed with standardized modular architecture, then adaptability and scalability are improved, but manufacturing complexity and module standardization requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodular configurabilityVSAvoidmodule standardization requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A universal standardized interface and connection framework is established that allows the same module design to be used across all module types. This universality simplifies manufacturing by reducing the variety of unique components that must be produced while enabling high configurability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If users migrate to a completely different control surface system when requirements change, then functional adequacy is maintained, but disruption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional adequacyVSAvoidsystem migration disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than replacing the entire control surface system, users can selectively add or reconfigure specific modules to meet changing requirements. The segmented architecture allows incremental evolution of the system while maintaining continuity with existing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic reconfiguration without complete replacement. Users can adapt their control surface by adding modules, removing unused ones, or changing configurations while maintaining the core system framework, avoiding the disruption of full system migration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10191607B2Modular audio control surface
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 AVID TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10191607B2 patent drawing
  • US10191607B2 patent drawing
  • US10191607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user-configurable modular audio control surface comprises master modules for controlling global surface properties and channel modules for controlling one or more individual audio channels. The modules are disposed in a two-dimensional spatial arrangement such that any module can occupy a location within the control surface not occupied by another module. The modules are connected to each other and to external platforms hosting media applications and plug-ins via a network. Control surface users can interact with external applications via remote graphical user interfaces displayed on modules within the surface, and can automate multiple external applications using an automation system built into the surface. Automation line graphs and metadata for both internal and external applications are displayed over the corresponding waveform displays that can include audio ahead of a current playback location.