Modular Avionics System Using Slice-Based Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional avionics systems face challenges in meeting advanced processing and high-speed interconnection demands while efficiently managing metrics like weight, size, and power, and struggle with scalability and reconfigurability.

Innovation Solution

A modular avionics system with a slice-based architecture, featuring centralized processing units and multi-core processors, where each unit is composed of self-contained slices that can be easily connected and disconnected for scalability and reconfigurability, allowing for independent manufacturing, testing, and upgrading of components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional distributed avionics architecture is used, then system functionality is maintained, but processing capability and interconnection speed are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterconnection speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent functional slices (display slice, control slice, processing slice) that can be manufactured and tested separately, then combined through standardized interfaces. This segmentation enables each module to achieve high-speed interconnection while maintaining overall system manageability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The slices are designed with universal interfaces and standardized protocols that allow them to function in multiple configurations. The same slice can be used in different system arrangements, enabling flexibility and high-speed communication across various applications without requiring architecture-specific optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional avionics systems are used, then current functionality is provided, but scalability and reconfigurability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reconfigurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into standardized slices with uniform interfaces, the architecture enables easy reconfiguration and scaling. Individual slices can be added, removed, or rearranged without affecting the entire system, while each slice maintains consistent manufacturing processes that simplify production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of functional parameters by reconfiguring which slices are activated or connected, rather than requiring physical redesign. This enables adaptability to different mission requirements while maintaining the same manufacturing standards for each slice type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If centralized processing is implemented, then processing capability is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing capability is segmented across multiple independent processing slices rather than consolidated in a single complex centralized unit. Each slice handles specific processing functions and can be optimized independently, while the modular architecture prevents overall system complexity from increasing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing processing power within a single centralized unit, the system adds processing capability by expanding the number and capacity of parallel slices. This dimensional approach to scaling allows enhanced processing power while maintaining manageable complexity through distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of repair

If modular design is adopted, then maintenance and upgrade costs are reduced, but interconnection requirements become more demanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costVSAvoidinterconnection speed requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The modular slice design allows individual slices to be easily replaced when malfunctioning or needing upgrades, rather than replacing the entire system. This approach reduces maintenance costs by isolating failures to individual replaceable modules while using standardized high-speed interfaces that remain consistent across generations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the system into standardized slices with uniform high-speed interfaces, the architecture simplifies maintenance while meeting speed requirements. Each slice can be independently tested, replaced, or upgraded without affecting other components, and the standardized interfaces ensure continuous high-speed communication capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8683105B1Modular avionics system
Publication Date: 2014.03.25 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US8683105B1 patent drawing
  • US8683105B1 patent drawing
  • US8683105B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The modular avionics system may include one or more centralized processing line-replaceable units (LRUs), the centralized processing LRUs including at least one multi-core computer processor, one or more multi-function display (MFD) units configured to receive imagery data from the centralized processing LRUs and display the imagery data on a display device, one or more control display units (CDUs) configured to receive imagery data from the centralized processing LRUs and display the imagery data on a display device, the MFD units and the CDUs including one or more user input devices, the MFD units and the CDUs including at least one logic module, the CDUs and the MFD units configured to transmit user input data from the user input devices to the centralized processing LRUs, the centralized processing LRUs constructed from a plurality of component slices, wherein a first component slice and at least a second component slice are reversibly couplable.