Modular Ballast Fastening for Soil Compactor Weight Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing soil compaction systems lack flexibility in ballast weight distribution and handling, particularly in allowing the use of sand and water as ballast, leading to inefficient load operation and handling challenges.

Innovation Solution

A machine weight regulation system comprising modular ballasts and a fastening system that enables the use of various weights, including sand and water, with improved load distribution between axles, featuring tie rods, fastening plates, and fasteners for secure attachment and easy handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If modular ballast systems are used with complex fitting mechanisms, then ballast can be securely fastened to the compactor, but production complexity and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballast fastening securityVSAvoidfitting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ballast system is divided into modular units that can be independently attached and detached. Each ballast unit has its own fastening mechanism, allowing them to be segmented and reconfigured based on specific compaction needs without requiring a complex integrated fitting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ballast units are designed with universal fastening features that can be attached to various positions on the compactor chassis. The same ballast module can serve multiple functions and be positioned differently depending on the load distribution requirements, eliminating the need for position-specific complex fittings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If ballast center of gravity is located above forklift forks, then ballast can be loaded onto the compactor, but handling becomes complicated and forklift forks may jam

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballast loading capabilityVSAvoidhandling operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ballast units are designed with lateral cuts or notches that provide lateral support surfaces for the forklift forks. This dimensional change from vertical support to lateral support allows the forks to engage the ballast at a lower point, preventing jamming while maintaining loading capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The lateral cuts on the ballast units act as intermediary contact surfaces between the forklift forks and the ballast body. These intermediaries provide stable engagement points that prevent direct fork-to-ballast top contact, eliminating the jamming issue while maintaining ease of loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If fixed ballast configurations are used, then compactor structure is simplified, but flexibility in weight adjustment and load distribution is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompactor structure simplicityVSAvoidballast weight flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The ballast system transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable configuration. Ballast units can be added or removed based on the specific compaction requirements, allowing the compactor weight to be dynamically adjusted without changing the basic compactor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the total ballast weight and distribution parameters by adding or removing individual ballast units. This enables adjustment of weight parameters to match different soil types and compaction specifications while maintaining a simple underlying compactor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If only solid ballast types are used, then handling and storage is simplified, but versatility in ballast type selection is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballast handling simplicityVSAvoidballast type variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system and ballast unit design are made universal to accommodate multiple ballast types including solid blocks, sand-filled containers, and water-filled bladders. The same attachment mechanism works with different ballast materials, providing versatility without complicating the handling system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the physical state and material parameters of the ballast by accepting solid blocks, granular sand, or liquid water in different container configurations. This enables selection of optimal ballast type for specific applications while maintaining consistent handling procedures through standardized units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10030340B2Machine weight regulation system
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 DYNAPAC DO BRASIL IND E COMERCIO DE MAQUINAS LTDA
  • US10030340B2 patent drawing
  • US10030340B2 patent drawing
  • US10030340B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to machine weight regulation system which comprises one or more ballasts (1); a fastening system (2); and a machine (3) containing a housing; capable of carrying a plurality of types of extra weight.