Modular Biomass Polygeneration Plant with Integrated Gasification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current micro-cogeneration plants using biomass are not modular, integrated, or efficient, leading to issues with fuel management, environmental impact, and limited popularity due to poor wood precursor quality and supply, which affects syngas production and plant operation.

Innovation Solution

A compact, modular biomass-fueled polygeneration plant with integrated modules for biomass processing, gasification, hydrogen production, and power generation, enabling flexible configuration and waste reduction through efficient fuel utilization and CO2 reutilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If micro-cogeneration plants are designed on skids with independent modules, then each module can be manufactured by specialized manufacturers, but the plant complexity increases and requires multiple persons for operation and maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing specializationVSAvoidplant integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines screening, drying, crushing, and briquetting units into a single integrated plant module, eliminating the need for separate outdoor specialized plants and reducing operational complexity while maintaining manufacturing specialization benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated plant design allows a single facility to perform multiple functions (screening, drying, crushing, briquetting, and gasification) that were previously distributed across separate modules, enabling one person to operate the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If outdoor specialized plants are used for fuel preparation, then large surfaces can be dedicated for each function, but the plant footprint increases and requires expensive concrete works for foundations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel preparation capacityVSAvoidinstallation surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates fuel preparation functions (screening, drying, crushing, briquetting) into a compact indoor plant design, eliminating the need for large outdoor surfaces and expensive concrete foundations while maintaining full fuel preparation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The plant modules are designed to be nested or closely integrated, with fuel preparation units positioned within or adjacent to the gasification system, maximizing space utilization and minimizing footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of operation

If wood chips are used as fuel without proper formulation, then fuel supply is easier, but the syngas production efficiency decreases and plant operation becomes unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel supplyVSAvoidsyngas production
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary fuel preparation steps (screening to remove contaminants, drying to control moisture, crushing to uniform size, and briquetting to compact form) before gasification, ensuring consistent fuel quality and reliable syngas production while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The plant controls key fuel parameters (moisture content, particle size, density) through integrated screening, drying, crushing, and briquetting units, transforming variable wood chips into standardized fuel with consistent combustion characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If gasification sections produce syngas with TAR content up to 5-6% by weight, then the gasification process is simple, but environmental burden increases and periodic disposal is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegasification processVSAvoidTAR production
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful TAR byproduct into a beneficial fuel source by using it as additional fuel for the gasification process, eliminating environmental disposal requirements and improving overall energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding TAR as waste requiring periodic disposal, the system recovers it and utilizes it as fuel, transforming a harmful factor into a useful resource

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The plant achieves high efficiency and flexibility in power generation, reduces waste, and ensures consistent fuel quality, addressing the limitations of existing systems by integrating biomass processing and power production, and enabling remote monitoring and configuration.

Implementation Method 1

a second gasification module (2) comprising at least one gasification reactor (20) and suitable for producing syngas comprising H2 and CO

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 2

a fourth module (4) comprising at least one fuel cell (40)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel cell: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentUS11262067B2Variously configurable biomass-fuelled polygeneration plant
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 RESET
  • US11262067B2 patent drawing
  • US11262067B2 patent drawing
  • US11262067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Polygeneration plant, fueled with biomass from various sources and with rated power included between 30 kW and 200 kW, including a plurality of specialised modules, the modules being at least one first module for loading and drying the biomass; at least one second gasification module suitable for producing the syngas starting from the biomass; at least one third module for automating and controlling the polygeneration process associated to the plant. The polygeneration plant includes at least one fourth module including at least one fuel cell, the fuel cell being of the SOFC or MCFC, PEMFC, PAFC, AFC type.